was not characterized

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not characterized" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing something that lacks specific traits or features in a particular context. Example: "The experiment was not characterized by any significant anomalies, indicating that the results were consistent with previous studies."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But it was not characterized, particularly at home, by selfless sacrifice.

The New York Times - Books

Suddenly, in Putin's answers, the West was not characterized as the force of evil.

The New Yorker

The driver was released last Thursday after local officials paid the kidnappers about $45,000, which was not characterized as a ransom.

The New York Times

However, the dentin/adhesive interface was not characterized regarding its infiltration.

Applied Adhesion Science

Even before the oil spill, his tenure was not characterized by smooth sailing.

Science Magazine

The second chapter includes an exploration of the American West, which Souter argues was not characterized by gunfighters, as is popularly believed.

Johns Hopkins University

They were reported not to normally need assistance, and post-parturition was not characterized by licking of calves or eating of afterbirths by dams.

Pastoralism

The type of parasite was not characterized in this study, but it was most likely Taenia solium tapeworm since it is endemic in much of Peru, with the greatest prevalence in rural communities [21].

Autoimmunity Highlights

Therefore, GB14382 was not characterized further.

Plosone

However, this interesting observation was not characterized further.

Plosone

The seventh mutant strain, cik1Δ, grows very poorly and was not characterized further.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not characterized", ensure the context clearly indicates what aspects were lacking in characterization to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was not characterized" excessively in technical documents. Instead, opt for more specific language that clarifies what information is missing or incomplete.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not characterized" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject did not receive characterization. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. The subject lacks specific, defined attributes or features.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

74%

News & Media

17%

Academia

9%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not characterized" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, particularly within scientific, academic, and news contexts. It indicates a lack of specific attributes or detailed information about a subject. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's validity and usability. When using this phrase, it's important to ensure clarity regarding what aspects were not characterized to avoid ambiguity. While common, it's advisable to avoid overuse in technical writing, opting for more precise language when possible.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not defined

Replaces "characterized" with "defined", focusing on the absence of a clear definition.

remained uncharacterized

Uses a different verb form to indicate the state of not being characterized.

was not identified

Shifts the focus to the absence of identification of specific attributes.

was not specified

Emphasizes the lack of specific details being provided.

was not detailed

Highlights the absence of detailed information or description.

lacked characterization

Changes the sentence structure to emphasize the absence of characterization as a whole.

was left undescribed

Highlights that a description of the characteristics was omitted.

was not delineated

Focuses on the lack of clear boundaries or distinctions.

was not known

Focuses on the lack of knowledge about the specific characteristics.

did not feature

Indicates that certain characteristics were absent or not present.

FAQs

What does "was not characterized" mean in a scientific context?

In a scientific context, "was not characterized" means that a particular substance, process, or phenomenon has not been fully studied or its properties have not been fully identified and described.

How can I rephrase "was not characterized" in a research paper?

You can rephrase "was not characterized" with alternatives like "was not defined", "remained uncharacterized", or "was left undescribed" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to use "was not characterized"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct to use "was not characterized". It follows standard English grammar rules and is commonly used in both formal and informal writing.

What is the difference between "was not characterized" and "was not identified"?

"Was not characterized" implies a lack of detailed description or study, while "was not identified" suggests that the specific nature or attributes of something are unknown. The choice depends on whether the focus is on the lack of description or the lack of recognition.