was not annihilated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not annihilated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing survival, existence, or the continuation of something despite potential destruction. Example: "Despite the overwhelming odds, the ancient civilization was not annihilated and continued to thrive for centuries."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

I was not annihilated.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

But the terrorists are not annihilated.

The New York Times

If the groups that have been forgotten are not annihilated, their painful memories continue to fester until they eventually erupt in renewed conflict.

SEP

3.41), a voluntary cleaving of the flesh or soul to the Word, and (in defiance of chemical facts) as the sublimation of the humanity by the divinity, as iron loses its form when held in an incandescent flame (Princ. 2.6.4) The humanity, for all that, is not annihilated, and Christ can speak at times as man and at others with God without being guilty of dissimulation (CommJohn 19.2.6).

SEP

The organization is conceived of as a prime site in which fraud is to be addressed – not annihilated but significantly reduced as long as sufficient care is devoted to establishing layers of vigilance.

Accounting, Organizations and Society

Rabbit, one poster, believed that despite war, climate change and a breathtaking acceleration of new technology, humankind was not about to annihilate itself.

The Guardian

This was not just a typhoon of record proportions; it was a tsunami, annihilating everything in its path.

Huffington Post

This was not simply a mode of warfare, but almost a symbol, an expression of a self-annihilating spirit.

The New York Times

Alderson, for now, is merely aiming for a season that is not obscured or annihilated by what the Wilpons have wrought.

The New York Times - Sports

The conversion of all questions of truth into questions of power, a process that truth itself cannot escape if it is not to be annihilated by power, not only suppresses truth as in earlier despotic orders, but has attacked the very heart of the distinction between true and false, which the hirelings of logic were in any case diligently working to abolish.

The New Yorker

I just realized there was an alternative, a way outside of the anxiety of sobriety that wasn't going to absolutely annihilate me.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was not annihilated" to emphasize the surprising or unexpected survival of something in the face of potentially destructive forces. It's stronger than simply saying something 'survived'.

Common error

Avoid using "was not annihilated" when a less dramatic phrase like "survived" or "was not damaged" would be more appropriate. Save it for situations where the potential for total destruction was significant.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not annihilated" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something avoided complete destruction. Ludwig AI suggests that it's grammatically correct and usable in written English. The phrase is typically used to assert that something, despite facing significant threats, managed to survive.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

38%

Encyclopedias

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

3%

Social Media

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was not annihilated" is a grammatically correct and effective way to express that something survived despite facing overwhelming destructive forces. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. It's most commonly found in news and scientific contexts, where its emphasis on resilience adds significant impact. While it's crucial to use it appropriately—avoiding overuse in simple scenarios—"was not annihilated" can powerfully convey the unexpected survival of a person, thing, or idea.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not destroyed

Emphasizes the absence of complete destruction.

was not eradicated

Focuses on the failure to completely eliminate something.

was not wiped out

Highlights the survival against potential extinction.

was not extinguished

Implies the continued existence of something that could have ceased.

was not eliminated

Stresses the lack of total removal.

was not terminated

Highlights the lack of a final ending or conclusion.

was not defeated

Focuses on the absence of being overcome in a conflict or struggle.

was not quashed

Implies the suppression or crushing of something that did not happen.

managed to survive

Highlights the active process of enduring and living through a threat.

remained intact

Emphasizes the preservation of something's original condition.

FAQs

How can I use "was not annihilated" in a sentence?

Use "was not annihilated" to emphasize survival despite overwhelming odds. For example, "Despite the economic crisis, the company "was not annihilated" and continued to operate".

What's the difference between "was not annihilated" and "was not destroyed"?

"Was not annihilated" implies a near-total obliteration that didn't happen, whereas "was not destroyed" simply means that something wasn't ruined or broken. The former has a stronger connotation of potential extinction.

What are some alternatives to "was not annihilated"?

You can use alternatives like "was not destroyed", "was not wiped out", or "managed to survive" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was not annihilate" instead of "was not annihilated"?

No, "was not annihilate" is grammatically incorrect. The correct past participle form of "annihilate" is "annihilated". The phrase "was not annihilate" is missing the -d ending and is not considered standard English.