Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was not affected
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was not affected" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that something did not experience a change, or that it was not influenced in any way. For example: The costs of the project were surprisingly high, but the original timeline was not affected.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Data, however, was not affected.
News & Media
Atg7 was not affected.
Science & Research
Subway service was not affected.
News & Media
Severity was not affected, either.
News & Media
LaGuardia was not affected at all.
News & Media
Chromate removal was not affected.
Science
They said patient care was not affected.
News & Media
Now he was not affected any more.
News & Media
The migratory ability was not affected.
Interleukin (IL -6 productIL -6as not affected.
Radiographic density was not affected by treatment.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "was not affected" to clearly state that a specific element remained unchanged despite other circumstances. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "was not affect" instead of "was not affected". The correct form uses the past participle "affected".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was not affected" primarily functions as a stative verb phrase. It indicates a state of being unchanged or uninfluenced by something. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.
Frequent in
Science
61%
News & Media
32%
Formal & Business
7%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "was not affected" is a versatile and commonly used expression to indicate that something remained unchanged despite external influences. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability, with numerous examples spanning various contexts from science and news to formal business. When aiming to communicate a lack of impact, alternatives like "remained unchanged" or "was unaffected" can provide stylistic variation. Remember to use the correct past participle form "affected" and to tailor your choice to the specific tone and audience of your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was unaffected
A shorter, more direct way of saying "was not affected."
remained unchanged
Emphasizes the lack of alteration or modification.
was not influenced
Focuses on the lack of influence on the subject.
was not altered
Highlights that no alteration occurred.
was not impacted
Replaces "affected" with "impacted", offering a slightly more forceful synonym.
stayed the same
A simple and direct way to express the lack of change.
was not disturbed
Implies that there was no disruption or interference.
was not touched
Emphasizes a complete absence of impact.
was immune to
Suggests a resistance or invulnerability to the effect.
was impervious to
Conveys a strong sense of resistance and inability to be affected.
FAQs
What does "was not affected" mean?
The phrase "was not affected" means that something remained unchanged or uninfluenced despite an external factor or event. It indicates a lack of impact or alteration.
What are some alternatives to saying "was not affected"?
You can use alternatives like "remained unchanged", "was unaffected", or "was not impacted" to convey a similar meaning.
How can I use "was not affected" in a sentence?
You can use "was not affected" to indicate that something didn't experience change. For example: "Despite the market crash, their investment strategy "remained unchanged" and their portfolio "was not affected"."
Is it better to say "unaffected" or "was not affected"?
Both "unaffected" and "was not affected" are grammatically correct and often interchangeable. "Unaffected" is more concise, while "was not affected" may provide slightly more emphasis, depending on the context.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested