was necessary for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was necessary for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when expressing the need for something to happen in order to reach a goal. For example: "The extra preparation for the presentation was necessary for a successful outcome."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Franco was necessary for Spain".

The New Yorker

But I was convinced it was necessary for survival.

The Guardian

I did what was necessary for the photographs".

The Guardian - Arts

Meticulous forward planning was necessary for "self-deliverance with certainty".

The Guardian

Turing thought that making mistakes was necessary for intelligent thought.

The Guardian

Some form of self-protection was necessary for the company.

The Guardian - Books

Iran said the work was necessary for safety reasons.

The New York Times

The CdS/n-TiO2 was necessary for Visible-light response.

Catalysis Today

Which was necessary for the survival of this fledgling republic".

The New York Times - Arts

Some kind of view was necessary "for my own sanity".

The New York Times

It was necessary for him to make you cry.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure that the sentence structure is clear when using "was necessary for", so the relationship between the necessity and the outcome is easily understood.

Common error

Avoid using "was necessary for" when a simpler phrasing would suffice. For example, instead of "The detailed explanation was necessary for clarity", consider "The detailed explanation clarified the issue".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was necessary for" functions as a linking phrase that connects a condition or action to its required outcome or purpose. As Ludwig AI indicates, it highlights the essentiality of one element in achieving another. The numerous examples confirm its role in establishing dependencies.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

42%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was necessary for" is a common and grammatically correct way to express that something was essential or required to achieve a specific outcome. Ludwig AI confirms its usability and wide application across various contexts. As evidenced by the numerous examples, it is frequently used in scientific and news-related writing, conveying a clear relationship between a prerequisite and its result. While it's important to avoid overuse and consider simpler phrasings where appropriate, mastering the use of "was necessary for" allows for precise and effective communication about dependencies and requirements.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was required for

Changes the verb from "necessary" to "required", emphasizing the mandatory aspect.

was essential for

Replaces "necessary" with "essential", highlighting the crucial importance of something.

was needed for

Substitutes "necessary" with "needed", focusing on a requirement or lack.

was vital for

Emphasizes the critical importance by using "vital" instead of "necessary".

was crucial for

Similar to "vital", it underscores the importance of something for a particular outcome.

was imperative for

Conveys a sense of urgency and indispensability, stronger than "necessary".

was critical for

Highlights the decisive importance of something.

was indispensable for

Suggests something is absolutely essential and cannot be done without.

was fundamental for

Indicates that something forms a basic or core element.

was a prerequisite for

States that something must happen or exist before something else is possible.

FAQs

What does "was necessary for" mean?

The phrase "was necessary for" indicates that something was essential or required to achieve a specific purpose or outcome. It highlights a condition that needed to be met.

How can I use "was necessary for" in a sentence?

You can use "was necessary for" to show the relationship between a requirement and a result. For example, "The training "was necessary for" the team to improve their skills".

What are some alternatives to "was necessary for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "was required for", "was essential for", or "was needed for". The choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "were necessary for" instead of "was necessary for"?

Yes, "were necessary for" is correct when referring to plural subjects. For instance, "The tools "were necessary for" the job" uses the plural form because "tools" is plural.