was named as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was named as" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to someone or something being given a title or position. For example, "A new CEO was named as Robert Smith this week."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A classmate was named as the former boyfriend.

The New York Times

Co-op was named as the most ethical.

Independent

The chief justice was named as the interim president.

The Economist

The other gunman was named as Nadir Soofi.

Independent

André Nzapayeke was named as the new prime minister.

The Economist

The dead officer was named as Clarissa Jean-Philippe.

Independent

Matt Smith was named as the new Doctor Who.

The Guardian

Brin's wife, Anne Wojcicki, was named as a fourth sponsor.

The Guardian

The student was named as Warmbier Otto Frederick.

The Guardian

What's more, Larry Brown was named as an assistant coach.

The New York Times - Sports

Last fall, the city was named as the summit site.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was named as" to clearly indicate an official designation, appointment, or naming. For example, "She was named as the new team captain."

Common error

Ensure the context makes it clear who or what is doing the naming. For example, instead of "He was named as the culprit", specify "The police named him as the culprit."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was named as" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject received the action of being named. This is confirmed by Ludwig AI, which validates its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

38%

Wiki

21%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was named as" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to denote the formal act of naming or appointing someone or something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and applicable in numerous contexts. Its prevalence is particularly evident in "news & media", "science", and "wiki" sources. To ensure clarity, always provide sufficient context to identify the naming authority. Consider using alternatives like "was appointed to" or "was designated as" to fine-tune your intended meaning. Remember that "was named as" provides a clear indication of the act of naming or assigning a role.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was appointed to

This alternative focuses on the act of assigning someone to a specific position or role.

was designated as

This phrase highlights the act of officially assigning a specific role or status.

was identified as

This option emphasizes the act of recognizing or establishing someone or something as a particular entity.

was selected for

This alternative highlights the choice of someone for a specific purpose or role.

was chosen to be

This phrase underscores the selection of someone for a particular identity or role.

was referred to as

This option emphasizes the way something is commonly addressed or known.

was known as

This alternative highlights common knowledge about how someone or something is called.

was tagged as

This suggests a labeling or categorization of someone or something.

was christened

More suitable for specific context of naming something.

was labeled

This option emphasizes a specific assignment of a label.

FAQs

What is the meaning of "was named as"?

The phrase "was named as" indicates that someone or something has been officially given a particular title, role, or designation. It suggests a formal act of naming or appointing.

How can I use "was named as" in a sentence?

You can use "was named as" to describe the action of appointing someone to a position: "She "was appointed as" the new CEO." Or to describe assigning a designation: "The area "was designated as" a protected zone."

What are some alternatives to "was named as"?

Some alternatives include "was appointed to", "was designated as", or "was identified as", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "was named as"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. The phrase is widely used and accepted in formal and informal writing to indicate the act of naming or appointing.