was appointed as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was appointed as" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a job or position that someone has been assigned: John Smith was appointed as the new CEO of the company.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He was appointed as editor in 2009.

The Guardian

The coefficient of standard deviation Vσ was appointed as the feature index.

Construction and Building Materials

He was appointed as his country's finance minister in 1989.

The New York Times

Yannick Nézet-Séguin was appointed as his successor.

Britannica

Mueller was appointed as special counsel on 17 May.

The Guardian

She was appointed as a deputy costs judge in 2006.

The Times

Permeability was appointed as key parameter for directly comparing temporary changes in membrane performance.

Desalination

General Kvashnin's deputy, Yuri Baluyevsky, was appointed as his successor.

The New York Times

Who was appointed as the government's chief scientific adviser?

The Guardian

Fraser was appointed as the Australian government's special envoy.

The Guardian

Linda Sharp was appointed as the interim head coach.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use synonyms such as "designated", "selected" or "named" to add variety and avoid repetition.

Common error

Avoid using "was appointed as to", as it can create a redundant construction. Instead, use "was appointed to" or "was appointed as". For instance, say "He was appointed as editor" or "He was appointed to the position of editor" instead of "He was appointed as to editor".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was appointed as" functions as a passive voice construction used to indicate that someone has been officially assigned or designated to a specific role, position, or responsibility. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

25%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was appointed as" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction that formally indicates someone's assignment to a role or position. As Ludwig AI explains, it's commonly found in neutral contexts such as news reports, scientific publications, and academic writing. While highly versatile, consider related phrases like "was designated as" or "was selected as" to add variety to your writing. Remember to avoid the redundant construction "was appointed as to". By understanding these nuances, you can effectively use "was appointed as" in various communication scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was designated as

Replaces 'appointed' with 'designated', implying a more formal or official assignment.

was selected as

Replaces 'appointed' with 'selected', suggesting a choice from multiple candidates.

was named as

Replaces 'appointed' with 'named', indicating a formal announcement of the assignment.

was chosen as

Replaces 'appointed' with 'chosen', emphasizing the act of selecting someone for the role.

was assigned as

Replaces 'appointed' with 'assigned', implying a task or duty has been given.

was installed as

Replaces 'appointed' with 'installed', often used for formal inaugurations or ceremonies.

was made

Simplifies the phrase, omitting "appointed as" for a more concise expression.

took on the role of

Expresses the assumption of a position without explicitly stating an appointment.

assumed the position of

Replaces "was appointed as" with a more formal way to express the beginning of the job.

was tasked with

Highlights the responsibilities given rather than the appointment itself.

FAQs

How do I use "was appointed as" in a sentence?

Use "was appointed as" to indicate that someone has been officially assigned a specific role or position. For example, "She was appointed as the new director of marketing".

What are some alternatives to "was appointed as"?

You can use alternatives like "was designated as", "was selected as", or "was named as" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was appointed to" instead of "was appointed as"?

Yes, both phrases are grammatically correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. "Was appointed as" is followed by the role or position, while "was appointed to" is followed by a more specific description of the position or a committee.

What's the difference between "was appointed as" and "became"?

"Was appointed as" indicates a formal assignment to a role, while "became" simply means someone assumed a role, possibly without a formal appointment. For example, "He was appointed as CEO" suggests a formal decision, whereas "He became CEO" could imply a more gradual transition.