Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was much reduced

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was much reduced" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a significant decrease in size, quantity, or intensity in a past context. Example: "After the budget cuts, the project's funding was much reduced, impacting its overall scope."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

In later years his wealth was much reduced.

The odor that was so prevalent in the 1970's was much reduced, he said.

News & Media

The New York Times

The population of the Ammonite cities was much reduced under King David.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

The size of his part in the two subsequent films was much reduced.

The fresh state results showed that the water demand was much reduced without affecting the workability.

He points to the period between 1950 and 1980 as one where inequality was much reduced.

News & Media

The Economist

Relations with the United States deteriorated throughout the 1970s, and U.S. aid was much reduced.

(The level of interest in Euro 2008 in England was much reduced without the team involved).

News & Media

The Economist

In Merychippus the ulna was fused with the radius and the fibula was much reduced.

This section of the original manuscript was much reduced by Garnett before publication.

This running bout was much reduced in control flies, showing that running was mostly caused by DNp09 activity.

Science & Research

Nature
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was much reduced", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being reduced and the reason for the reduction. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "was much reduced" when the decrease is minimal or insignificant. Reserve it for situations where the reduction has a noticeable or important effect.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was much reduced" functions as a verbal phrase indicating a state of diminished quantity, size, or intensity. As shown in Ludwig, it commonly connects a subject with its diminished state. The Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

54%

News & Media

28%

Encyclopedias

14%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was much reduced" serves to effectively communicate a significant decrease across various contexts. As shown by Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and frequently used in academic, scientific, and journalistic writing. While alternatives like "was significantly decreased" or "was greatly diminished" exist, the phrase remains a straightforward and reliable option, particularly when the degree of reduction needs emphasis. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in English.

FAQs

How can I use "was much reduced" in a sentence?

Use "was much reduced" to describe a significant decrease in quantity, size, or intensity. For instance, "After the budget cuts, the funding "was much reduced"".

What are some alternatives to "was much reduced"?

You can use alternatives like "was significantly decreased", "was greatly diminished", or "experienced a sharp decline depending on the context.

Is it more appropriate to say "was greatly reduced" or "was much reduced"?

Both "was greatly reduced" and ""was much reduced"" are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning. The choice depends on stylistic preference, although "greatly" might imply a larger degree of reduction.

What is the difference between "was reduced" and "was much reduced"?

"Was reduced" simply indicates a decrease. Adding "much" before "reduced" emphasizes that the reduction was substantial or significant. The phrase "was much reduced" is useful when emphasizing the magnitude of the decrease.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: