Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was monitored by

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was monitored by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something was under observation or surveillance by a specific entity or individual. Example: "The experiment was monitored by a team of researchers to ensure accurate results."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

His heartbeat was monitored by a machine.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The reaction mixture was monitored by TLC.

The reaction process was monitored by TLC.

The reaction progress was monitored by TLC.

The progression was monitored by TLC.

The process was monitored by fluorescence microscopy.

Growth was monitored by measuring turbidity (OD660).

The reaction was monitored by TLC.

The conversion was monitored by HPLC.

Fluorescent intensity was monitored by flow cytometry.

Reperfusion recovery was monitored by Laser Doppler.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Clearly identify the entity doing the monitoring to provide context and avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of "The patient was monitored by", specify "The patient was monitored by the nursing staff".

Common error

Ensure that the subject being monitored and the method of monitoring are clear. Avoid vague sentences like "Progress was monitored" without specifying how or by whom.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was monitored by" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received the action of being observed or tracked by a specific agent. Ludwig AI confirms its usability, as demonstrated by the examples provided.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

80%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was monitored by" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive voice construction that indicates observation or tracking by a specific entity. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, highlighting its prevalence in scientific and news contexts. When using this phrase, ensure that you clearly specify both the subject being monitored and the entity responsible for monitoring. Be aware of alternative phrases like "was supervised by" or "was observed by", which may be more appropriate depending on the specific context. By following these guidelines, you can effectively use "was monitored by" in your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "was monitored by" in a sentence?

Use "was monitored by" to indicate that a subject or process was under observation by a specific entity. For example, "The experiment "was monitored by" a team of scientists".

What are some alternatives to saying "was monitored by"?

You can use alternatives like "was supervised by", "was overseen by", or "was tracked by" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was monitored by"?

While "was monitored by" is in the passive voice, its suitability depends on the context. If the monitoring entity is important to highlight, active voice might be better (e.g., "Researchers monitored the experiment").

What is the difference between "was monitored by" and "was observed by"?

"Was monitored by" often implies a continuous and systematic tracking, while "was observed by" suggests a more general act of watching and noticing details. The choice depends on the specific nuances you want to convey.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: