was monitored

USAGE SUMMARY

"was monitored" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the act of being watched or observed. For example, "The construction site was monitored by a team of experts."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

His breathing was monitored.

The New Yorker

Patient D was monitored closely.

The Guardian - Books

Mrs. Buck's mail was monitored.

The New Yorker

His heartbeat was monitored by a machine.

The New Yorker

Aswany assumed that his phone was monitored.

The New Yorker

OD600 was monitored simultaneously.

AMB Express

Survival was monitored for 1w.

Annals of Intensive Care

OD600 (diamonds) was monitored simultaneously.

AMB Express

was monitored at 265 nm.

AMB Express

Colouring was monitored ad oculos.

EJNMMI Research

Only bacteria grazing was monitored.

International Aquatic Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using more specific verbs (e.g., tracked, observed, supervised) if the context requires a more precise description of the monitoring activity.

Common error

Avoid using "was monitored" excessively in your writing. While grammatically correct, overuse can make your writing sound passive and less engaging. Instead, consider rewriting the sentence in the active voice to emphasize who or what is doing the monitoring.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was monitored" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject received the action of being observed or tracked. As supported by Ludwig AI, this usage aligns with standard English grammar.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was monitored" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive verb phrase that communicates observation or tracking. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it commonly appears in scientific and news contexts, with neutral to formal register. While versatile, writers should be mindful of overuse and consider active voice constructions where appropriate. The phrase is supported by various authoritative sources, affirming its wide acceptance in English writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was observed

This focuses on visual or factual noting of something without necessarily implying active oversight.

was supervised

This implies a higher level of control and management than simple monitoring.

was tracked

This suggests following something's progress or movement over time.

was watched

This indicates a direct and potentially continuous form of observation.

was overseen

This implies a responsibility for the correct functioning or execution of something.

was checked

This suggests a verification process to ensure standards are met.

was inspected

This emphasizes a formal or official examination.

was examined

This indicates a detailed and thorough investigation.

was assessed

This focuses on evaluating the quality or value of something.

was regulated

This implies control and adherence to a set of rules or guidelines.

FAQs

How can I use "was monitored" in a sentence?

You can use "was monitored" to describe a situation where someone or something was observed or tracked over a period. For example, "The patient's heart rate "was monitored" closely by the nurses".

What are some alternatives to "was monitored"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "was observed", "was supervised", or "was tracked".

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "monitor"?

While "was monitored" (passive) is correct, using the active voice can often make your writing more direct. For instance, instead of "The experiment "was monitored" by the scientists", you could say "The scientists monitored the experiment."

What is the difference between "was monitored" and "is monitored"?

"Was monitored" indicates that the monitoring occurred in the past, while "is monitored" indicates that the monitoring is currently happening or is a regular practice. For example, "The patient's progress "was monitored" last week", versus "The patient's progress "is monitored" daily".