Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was mixed with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was mixed with" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to describe a situation where two or more substances or elements have been combined together. Example: The batter was mixed with milk and eggs to create a smooth and creamy texture.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

DREAD was mixed with anger.

News & Media

The Economist

Delight was mixed with melancholy.

Yet his warmth was mixed with serious disappointment.

News & Media

The New Yorker

But that message was mixed with more general calls for jobs and even revolution.

News & Media

The New Yorker

This was mixed with good performances and Kilbane was unable to pinpoint any specific event.

Apparently cow's blood was mixed with adobe to make a smooth, slick floor.

Cabbage leaves were placed on wounds; cabbage juice was mixed with honey to salve the eyes.

Their grief was mixed with anger that Asif was even at the hostel.

News & Media

The Guardian

The global performance was mixed, with Germany the star, up 25%.

Relief that the ordeal was over was mixed with dismay among those watching.

News & Media

The Guardian

Standard fare by Brahms and Tchaikovsky was mixed with far-out West Coast sounds.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was mixed with", ensure the elements being combined are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. Specify the proportions or method of mixing if relevant to your context.

Common error

Avoid relying solely on passive constructions like "was mixed with". Occasionally rephrase using active voice to create a more direct and engaging tone. For example, instead of "The ingredients were mixed with a spoon", try "She mixed the ingredients with a spoon".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was mixed with" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject received a combination of elements. Ludwig's examples show it describing physical mixtures (ingredients, fluids) and abstract combinations (emotions, ideas).

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

55%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was mixed with" is a versatile phrase used to describe the combination of two or more elements. It is grammatically correct and frequently found in both scientific and journalistic contexts, as evidenced by the numerous examples provided by Ludwig. While it is generally neutral in tone, remember to use the active voice where appropriate for a more engaging writing style. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is valid and widely applicable in various writing scenarios.

FAQs

How can I use "was mixed with" in a sentence?

You can use "was mixed with" to describe the combination of different elements or substances. For example, "The paint was mixed with water to achieve the desired consistency."

What are some alternatives to "was mixed with"?

Alternatives include "was combined with", "was blended with", or "was incorporated into", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "was mixed with" formal or informal?

"Was mixed with" is generally considered neutral in tone and can be used in both formal and informal contexts. The formality often depends more on the surrounding vocabulary and sentence structure.

What's the difference between "was mixed with" and "included"?

"Was mixed with" implies an active combination of ingredients, while "included" simply indicates the presence of something as part of a whole. For example, "The recipe was mixed with spices" suggests the spices were stirred in, while "The recipe included spices" only confirms their presence.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: