was liberalised

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was liberalised" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where restrictions or regulations have been relaxed or removed in the past. Example: "The telecommunications market was liberalised to encourage competition and improve services for consumers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

24 human-written examples

The economy was liberalised, but progress to democracy was slow.

The Guardian

"In 1998, as the market was liberalised, the regulator believed 1.5% was an adequate margin for energy suppliers.

The Guardian - Business

When Japan's telecoms market was liberalised in the 1990s the former monopoly operator, NTT, was forced to compete.

The Economist

The slave trade boomed when it was liberalised by the Spanish crown after Spain failed to control the smuggling of black Africans.

The Guardian - Books

Its managers look rattled.Even before private subscriber traffic was liberalised on January 1st, Telekom was suffering from deregulation of services to businesses.

The Economist

But eight years after their industry was liberalised and five years after a financial crisis that brought some close to collapse, Europe's big telecoms incumbents face troubled times.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

36 human-written examples

He added: "Lukashenko tried to make cosmetic changes and pretend he was liberalising Belarus - but he slipped back into his old, repressive ways".

The Guardian

The electricity industry will also be liberalised.

The Economist

Energy and telecoms markets have been liberalised.

The Economist

"For the economy to mature it needs to be liberalised.

The Guardian

Laws against abortion in Ghana and Ethiopia have been liberalised.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was liberalised", clearly specify what aspect was liberalised (e.g., "the economy", "trade laws", "immigration policy") for clarity and context.

Common error

Ensure that the sentence using "was liberalised" clearly indicates the timeframe of the liberalization, as failing to do so can lead to confusion about whether the change is still in effect.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was liberalised" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a particular entity or system underwent a process of liberalization. According to Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

72%

Science

16%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was liberalised" is a grammatically sound and commonly used passive construction to describe the act of making something less restrictive. As Ludwig confirms, this phrase appears frequently in news articles, academic papers, and other formal writings. When employing this phrase, ensure that the subject being liberalised is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. Remember to consider related phrases like "was deregulated" or "was opened up" depending on the nuances you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was deregulated

Focuses on the removal of specific regulations rather than a broader shift towards freedom.

was freed up

Emphasizes the removal of constraints, allowing something to move or operate more easily.

was opened up

Highlights the act of making something accessible or available to more people or entities.

underwent liberalization

A more formal way of saying that something has been subject to a process of liberalization.

saw deregulation

Focuses on the active event of removing regulations.

was reformed

Suggests a restructuring or modification to improve a system or process.

experienced deregulation

Highlights the subject's experience of having regulations removed.

was made less restrictive

Emphasizes the reduction of limitations without necessarily implying full liberalization.

was eased

Indicates that restrictions or burdens were made lighter or less severe.

became more permissive

Focuses on the change in attitude or policy towards allowing something.

FAQs

How can I use "was liberalised" in a sentence?

Use "was liberalised" to describe a past action where rules or restrictions were made less strict. For example, "The market "was liberalised" to encourage competition".

What's a good alternative to "was liberalised"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include "was deregulated", "was freed up", or "was opened up". Choose the one that best fits the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "the market was liberalised"?

Yes, "the market "was liberalised"" is grammatically correct and commonly used to describe a market where restrictions have been eased.

What's the difference between "was liberalised" and "was deregulated"?

"Was liberalised" implies a broad shift towards fewer restrictions, while "was deregulated" specifically refers to the removal of particular regulations. Deregulation is a subset of liberalization. For example, the market "was deregulated".