was largely gone

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was largely gone" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that has mostly disappeared or is no longer present. Example: "After the storm, the once vibrant garden was largely gone, leaving only a few wilted flowers behind."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

The sleep inertia was largely gone.

The New Yorker

Adam's hair was gray, mine was largely gone, and we waved to each other.

The New Yorker

The charming young man his family had known was largely gone.

The New York Times - Books

The optimism was largely gone – and with it both the excitement and the delusion.

The Guardian - Opinion

Then, even when the food was largely gone, the bacteria would linger for a while in abundance.

The New York Times

The magical coating of white crystal was largely gone, rubbed off, presumably, by people like us tramping all over it.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

Those market makers are largely gone now.

The New York Times

The rages are largely gone.

The Guardian

"Today, that hope is largely gone".

The New York Times - Tech

Those loopholes are largely gone now.

The New York Times - Travel

The 1990s concessions to urban-minded sportswear are largely gone.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was largely gone" to describe a state where something has significantly diminished or disappeared, but not entirely. For example, "The initial excitement was largely gone after the first week."

Common error

Avoid using "was largely gone" when something has completely disappeared. Instead, use phrases like "was completely gone" or "vanished entirely" to reflect the total absence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was largely gone" functions as a descriptive predicate, indicating a state of significant reduction or near absence. Ludwig's examples illustrate its use in various contexts to describe the state of things like optimism, fear, or physical objects.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was largely gone" is a versatile expression used to indicate a state of significant diminution or near absence, without implying complete disappearance. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage, particularly in news and media contexts. While alternatives like "had mostly disappeared" and "was almost entirely absent" exist, "was largely gone" offers a specific nuance that balances between presence and absence. Use it to add depth and precision to your writing when describing evolving states or diminished qualities.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had mostly disappeared

Emphasizes the process of disappearing over time.

had substantially diminished

Highlights a significant reduction in quantity or impact.

was almost entirely absent

Stresses the near-complete lack of something.

was virtually non-existent

Indicates something is practically not there.

had largely faded away

Suggests a gradual disappearance, often of something intangible.

was significantly reduced

Focuses on the reduction in size, amount, or intensity.

was mostly depleted

Implies a reduction in available resources or supply.

had greatly lessened

Indicates a decrease in degree or intensity.

was substantially curtailed

Emphasizes a restriction or limitation that has been imposed.

had significantly waned

Suggests a decline in power, influence, or popularity.

FAQs

How can I use "was largely gone" in a sentence?

Use "was largely gone" to indicate that something has significantly diminished or disappeared but is not entirely absent. For example: "The fear "was largely gone" after the treatment".

What are some alternatives to "was largely gone"?

Alternatives include "had mostly disappeared", "had substantially diminished", or "was almost entirely absent", depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "is largely gone" instead of "was largely gone"?

Yes, "is largely gone" is correct when referring to the present. "Was largely gone" refers to the past. The choice depends on the tense of the sentence.

What is the difference between "was largely gone" and "was completely gone"?

"Was largely gone" indicates that something has significantly diminished but is not entirely absent, while "was completely gone" means that something has entirely disappeared.