was joined by

USAGE SUMMARY

"was joined by" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used to describe a situation in which two or more people become part of a larger group. For example, "Jenny was joined by her friends for the celebration."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Mr. Smith was joined by his daughter.

The New York Times

Rockefeller was joined by the Marisla Foundation.

The New York Times

He was joined by other officers.

The New York Times - Tech

He was joined by Gauguin.

The New York Times - Arts

He was joined by comedian Al Murray and Eddie Izzard.

Independent

He was joined by marketing manager John McFarland.

The New York Times

He was joined by his son, Rocco Chierichella, Jr.

The New Yorker

His opinion was joined by Judge Guido Calabresi.

The New York Times

He was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, and Alito.

The New York Times

Later, he was joined by his mother.

The Guardian - Books

He was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Breyer and Alito.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was joined by" when you want to emphasize that someone or something became part of an existing group or situation. It's particularly useful for describing events where participation is key.

Common error

Avoid using "was joined by" when the subject is inanimate and cannot actively join something. For example, instead of "The building was joined by an annex", use "An annex was added to the building".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was joined by" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received an action. Specifically, it signifies that someone or something became part of a group or was accompanied by another entity. Ludwig provides numerous examples of this usage in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

74%

Wiki

14%

Science

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was joined by" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to describe the act of someone or something becoming a part of a group or being accompanied. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is widely used across diverse contexts, most prominently in news and media. While alternatives such as "was accompanied by" or "was assisted by" exist, "was joined by" emphasizes the action of joining a pre-existing entity. It's important to ensure the subject can logically perform the action of joining. Overall, it is a versatile phrase for reporting events and describing relationships between entities.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was accompanied by

Focuses on accompaniment rather than a formal joining.

was assisted by

Emphasizes help or support provided by the additional entity.

was supplemented by

Highlights the addition of something to complete or enhance.

was seconded by

Implies formal support, often in official settings.

was united with

Suggests a more profound connection or merging.

was merged with

Indicates a complete integration of entities.

was coupled with

Emphasizes a pairing or connection between two things.

was aligned with

Focuses on agreement or shared direction.

was associated with

Highlights a general connection or relationship.

was connected to

Indicates a physical or logical link.

FAQs

How do I use "was joined by" in a sentence?

Use "was joined by" to indicate that a person or thing became a member of or connected to an existing group or entity. For example, "The senator was joined by several other officials at the press conference."

What are some alternatives to "was joined by"?

You can use alternatives such as "was accompanied by", "was assisted by", or "was supplemented by" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "was joined with" instead of "was joined by"?

While "was joined with" is grammatically acceptable, "was joined by" is more common and generally preferred when referring to people or groups joining together. "Was joined with" might be more appropriate when describing objects being physically connected.

What is the difference between "was joined by" and "was accompanied by"?

"Was joined by" suggests a more formal or intentional inclusion, while "was accompanied by" simply means someone or something was present with another.