Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was involved by

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was involved by" is not correct and is not typically used in written English.
It is generally used incorrectly as it suggests an agent performing an action on the subject, which is not the standard usage for "involved." Example: "The project was involved by several key stakeholders" should be rephrased for clarity.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

In the present case, only the right adrenal was involved by the tumour; the left adrenal was normal in imaging studies.

We strictly enforced that each image would be assigned a single map process and no reduce process was involved by configuring two Hadoop's properties as follows: mapreduce.job.maps and mapreduce.jobs.reduces.reduces

In addition, direct alteration in cellular respiration with mitochondrial dysfunction also was advocated [13], and, finally, Tavernier et al. suggested that increased phosphorylation of troponin I was involved by reducing myofilament response to Ca2+ [14].

Histologically, the lymph node along the extrahepatic bile duct was involved by well-differentiated adenocarcinoma with mucinous carcinoma, which is similar to cecal cancer ((A) H&E, original magnification; (B) H&E, low magnification).

She underwent subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Histologically, the lymph node along the extrahepatic bile duct was involved by well-differentiated adenocarcinoma with mucinous carcinoma, which is similar to cecal cancer.

Although this tool was primarily designed for experiments where sample-pooling was involved, by setting the pooling parameters properly it can also be used as a general power and sample size calculation tool for two-sample t test with equal variance.

Science

Plosone
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

An optimal filtering capability is involved by the Kalman design.

"I am never going to not be involved, by my choice, with the New York Mets".

Switzerland, the Bahamas and Singapore will be involved by 2018, along with Panama.

News & Media

The Guardian

Thirty-five students were involved by 1941, including lively DJ "Flunks" Fales '43.

It has to be involved by Whitehall in any post-conflict situation.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Opt for clearer passive constructions such as "was affected by" or active voice constructions to convey the intended meaning more effectively.

Common error

Avoid using "was involved by" when you mean to say something was affected or influenced by something else. Using phrases like "affected by" or rewriting in active voice can improve clarity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

2.4/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was involved by" functions as a passive construction, but it's often grammatically incorrect. Ludwig suggests that it's not the standard usage for "involved". The intention is usually to show how a subject is affected or influenced.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Academia

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was involved by" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and awkward. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is not standard English and often misused. While examples exist across various domains, it's crucial to opt for clearer alternatives like "was affected by" or restructure sentences in the active voice. Using grammatically sound constructions enhances clarity and precision in writing, especially in formal contexts. This analysis highlights the importance of careful phrasing to avoid misinterpretations and maintain credibility.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "was involved by"?

Depending on the intended meaning, you can use phrases like "was affected by", "was influenced by", or rewrite the sentence in the active voice.

Is "was involved by" grammatically correct?

The phrase "was involved by" is generally considered grammatically awkward and is not recommended in formal writing. It often indicates a misunderstanding of passive voice construction.

How can I use "was involved" correctly in a sentence?

Use "was involved in" to indicate participation or engagement. For example, "The researcher was involved in the study". Avoid using "was involved by" as it is grammatically incorrect.

What's the difference between "was involved in" and "was involved by"?

"Was involved in" indicates participation or engagement, while "was involved by" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Use "was involved in" to maintain clarity and grammatical correctness.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

2.4/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: