Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was involved by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was involved by" is not correct and is not typically used in written English.
It is generally used incorrectly as it suggests an agent performing an action on the subject, which is not the standard usage for "involved." Example: "The project was involved by several key stakeholders" should be rephrased for clarity.
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(20)
was engaged by
was affected by
was influenced by
was impacted by
was engaged in
was a part of
was connected to
was associated with
was related to
was subject to
was exposed to
was consisted by
was invited by
was integrated by
was incorporated by
was implicated by
was dictated by
was surrounded by
was incapacitated by
was run by
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
11 human-written examples
In the present case, only the right adrenal was involved by the tumour; the left adrenal was normal in imaging studies.
Science
We strictly enforced that each image would be assigned a single map process and no reduce process was involved by configuring two Hadoop's properties as follows: mapreduce.job.maps and mapreduce.jobs.reduces.reduces
Science
In addition, direct alteration in cellular respiration with mitochondrial dysfunction also was advocated [13], and, finally, Tavernier et al. suggested that increased phosphorylation of troponin I was involved by reducing myofilament response to Ca2+ [14].
Science
Histologically, the lymph node along the extrahepatic bile duct was involved by well-differentiated adenocarcinoma with mucinous carcinoma, which is similar to cecal cancer ((A) H&E, original magnification; (B) H&E, low magnification).
Science
She underwent subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Histologically, the lymph node along the extrahepatic bile duct was involved by well-differentiated adenocarcinoma with mucinous carcinoma, which is similar to cecal cancer.
Science
Although this tool was primarily designed for experiments where sample-pooling was involved, by setting the pooling parameters properly it can also be used as a general power and sample size calculation tool for two-sample t test with equal variance.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
49 human-written examples
An optimal filtering capability is involved by the Kalman design.
Science
"I am never going to not be involved, by my choice, with the New York Mets".
News & Media
Switzerland, the Bahamas and Singapore will be involved by 2018, along with Panama.
News & Media
Thirty-five students were involved by 1941, including lively DJ "Flunks" Fales '43.
Academia
It has to be involved by Whitehall in any post-conflict situation.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Opt for clearer passive constructions such as "was affected by" or active voice constructions to convey the intended meaning more effectively.
Common error
Avoid using "was involved by" when you mean to say something was affected or influenced by something else. Using phrases like "affected by" or rewriting in active voice can improve clarity.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.4/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was involved by" functions as a passive construction, but it's often grammatically incorrect. Ludwig suggests that it's not the standard usage for "involved". The intention is usually to show how a subject is affected or influenced.
Frequent in
Science
40%
News & Media
30%
Academia
30%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was involved by" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and awkward. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is not standard English and often misused. While examples exist across various domains, it's crucial to opt for clearer alternatives like "was affected by" or restructure sentences in the active voice. Using grammatically sound constructions enhances clarity and precision in writing, especially in formal contexts. This analysis highlights the importance of careful phrasing to avoid misinterpretations and maintain credibility.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was affected by
Focuses on the impact or influence something had on the subject, rather than direct involvement.
was impacted by
Similar to 'affected by', emphasizing the result or change experienced by the subject.
was influenced by
Highlights the causative role one entity has on another, shifting the focus from participation to impact.
was engaged in
Indicates active participation or direct involvement in an activity or event, differing from indirect influence.
was a part of
Emphasizes that the subject was an element or component of a larger whole.
was connected to
Implies a relationship or link between the subject and another entity, not necessarily direct involvement.
was associated with
Suggests a correlation or connection, rather than direct participation or influence.
was related to
Highlights a link or relationship, often without specifying the nature of the involvement.
was subject to
Indicates that the subject underwent or experienced something, shifting the focus from active participation.
was exposed to
Suggests that the subject came into contact with or experienced something, differing from active involvement.
FAQs
What are some alternatives to "was involved by"?
Depending on the intended meaning, you can use phrases like "was affected by", "was influenced by", or rewrite the sentence in the active voice.
Is "was involved by" grammatically correct?
The phrase "was involved by" is generally considered grammatically awkward and is not recommended in formal writing. It often indicates a misunderstanding of passive voice construction.
How can I use "was involved" correctly in a sentence?
Use "was involved in" to indicate participation or engagement. For example, "The researcher was involved in the study". Avoid using "was involved by" as it is grammatically incorrect.
What's the difference between "was involved in" and "was involved by"?
"Was involved in" indicates participation or engagement, while "was involved by" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Use "was involved in" to maintain clarity and grammatical correctness.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.4/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested