was interviewed by

USAGE SUMMARY

'was interviewed by' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when one person is questioning another for a specific purpose, such as a job, research project, or other type of inquiry. For example, "She was interviewed by the local newspaper about her success as a business owner."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

The author was interviewed by CityLab.

Harvard University

She was interviewed by Natasha Dachos, LMSW.

Columbia University

First, Ms. Palin was interviewed by Matt Lauer.

The New York Times

No one else was interviewed by Toback.

The Guardian - Film

Vikash Tatayah was interviewed by Georgina Kenyon.

The Guardian

She was interviewed by Gustav Niebuhr.

The New York Times

Muhamad Nasir was interviewed by Angela Dewan.

The Guardian

Katherine Ronderos was interviewed by Cheryl Gallagher.

The Guardian

He was interviewed by the U.S.C.

The New York Times

Roshni Devi was interviewed by Neeta Lal.

The Guardian

Professor Andrew Dolkart was interviewed by the Wall Street Journal.

Columbia University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a formal investigation or legal proceeding, consider using "was questioned by" instead to highlight the nature of the questioning.

Common error

Avoid using the active voice when you want to focus on the person being interviewed. For example, instead of saying "The journalist interviewed her", use "She was interviewed by the journalist" to emphasize her role.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was interviewed by" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received an interview from a specified person or entity. Ludwig examples confirm its use in attributing information to a source, aligning with Ludwig AI's assessment.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Academia

20%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Science

3%

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was interviewed by" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive voice construction that indicates a person or entity has provided information in an interview. As affirmed by Ludwig AI, it is appropriate for various contexts, but particularly common in news and academic writing. When using this phrase, emphasize the interviewer or media outlet. For different emphasis, consider alternatives like "had an interview with" or "spoke with". Remember to avoid active voice constructions when the focus should be on the interviewee.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

gave an interview to

Highlights the interviewee's action of providing the interview.

had an interview with

Rephrases to emphasize the act of having an interview from the interviewee's perspective.

was questioned by

Emphasizes the questioning aspect of the interview process.

participated in an interview with

A more formal and detailed way of describing the interview process.

spoke with

A more general term indicating a conversation or discussion, potentially less formal.

underwent an interview with

Focuses on the experience of being subjected to the interview process.

was featured in an interview with

Highlights that the interview was published or broadcast as a feature.

sat down with

Suggests a more relaxed and informal interview setting.

collaborated on an interview with

Suggests a collaborative effort in creating the interview content.

had a conversation with

A broader term indicating a dialogue, which may or may not be a formal interview.

FAQs

How do I use "was interviewed by" in a sentence?

Use "was interviewed by" to indicate that someone provided information to an interviewer. For example, "The expert "was interviewed by" the BBC regarding the new climate report".

What can I say instead of "was interviewed by"?

You can use alternatives like "spoke with", "gave an interview to", or "had an interview with" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "was interviewed by" or "had an interview with"?

Both are correct, but ""was interviewed by"" emphasizes the interviewer, while "had an interview with" focuses on the interviewee's experience.

What is the difference between "was interviewed by" and "was questioned by"?

"Was interviewed by" suggests a more general conversation, while "was questioned by" indicates a more formal or investigative process.