was interfered with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was interfered with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a situation where an action or process was disrupted or obstructed by an external factor. Example: "The investigation was interfered with by outside influences, making it difficult to reach a conclusion."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

27 human-written examples

Local fishing was interfered with.

The New Yorker

The Canadiens complained that their goaltender was interfered with.

The New York Times - Sports

In an interview, Ms. Scarlett said: "The idea that any science was interfered with could not be more inaccurate.

The New York Times

Unfortunately, their plan was interfered with by three menNa lab assistant with a grudge against Tichy, and his accomplices.

The New Yorker

But Chicago scored three times in ten minutes, the third a penalty as Frolik was interfered with when clean through on the net.

The Guardian - Sport

Washington challenged that Holtby was interfered with, but Saku Maenalanen wasn't in the crease when he made slight contact with Holtby just before the goal was scored.

The Washington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

33 human-written examples

I was interfering with their marriage".

The Guardian - Books

I don't think Suarez was interfering with play.

The Guardian - Sport

The I.O.C. denied today that it was interfering with research on drug tests.

The New York Times - Sports

But it was clear from the replay that none was interfering with play.

The Guardian - Sport

In the original his offence was interfering with women, whereas here it is male importuning.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was interfered with", clearly specify what or who caused the interference to provide context and clarity. For example, "The experiment was interfered with by unexpected vibrations."

Common error

Avoid using "was interfered with" without specifying what did the interfering. Ambiguity can confuse the reader; always clarify the source of the interference.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was interfered with" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject received interference from an external source. Ludwig AI provides examples of its usage across diverse contexts. For example: "Local fishing was interfered with."

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Encyclopedias

12.5%

Less common in

Wiki

8.3%

Formal & Business

4.2%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was interfered with" is a common and grammatically correct passive construction used to describe situations where something has been disrupted or obstructed. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage spans various contexts, from news reporting to scientific literature. To ensure clarity, it's best to specify the source of the interference. While synonyms like ""was obstructed"" or ""was hindered"" exist, the choice depends on the specific nuance desired. The phrase's neutral register makes it widely applicable across different writing styles. Avoiding vague subject matter and being precise in identifying the cause of interference are key to using this phrase effectively.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was obstructed

Replaces "interfered" with a more direct synonym, emphasizing blockage.

was hindered

Substitutes "interfered" with another synonym highlighting the slowing or prevention of progress.

was disrupted

Focuses on the interruption of a process or activity, changing the nuance slightly.

was hampered

Similar to "hindered", but often implies a more significant impediment.

was meddled with

Suggests unwanted or inappropriate intervention.

was tampered with

Implies malicious or unauthorized alteration.

was impinged upon

More formal and suggests an encroachment or infringement.

faced interference

Shifts the sentence structure to an active voice while retaining the core meaning.

had its course altered

Emphasizes the change in direction or progress due to external influence.

experienced obstruction

Replaces the verb with a noun, altering the sentence structure.

FAQs

How can I use "was interfered with" in a sentence?

Use "was interfered with" to describe a situation where something was disrupted or obstructed. For example, "The signal "was interfered with" by atmospheric conditions."

What are some alternatives to "was interfered with"?

Alternatives include "was obstructed", "was hindered", or "was disrupted". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "was interfered with" in active or passive voice?

While "was interfered with" is in passive voice, consider rewriting in active voice for a more direct style. For example, instead of "The program was interfered with", you could say "External factors interfered with the program."

What's the difference between "was interfered with" and "was tampered with"?

"Was interfered with" generally means something was disrupted. "Was tampered with" "was tampered with" implies malicious or unauthorized alteration.