was intentionally omitted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was intentionally omitted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was deliberately left out or excluded from a document or statement. Example: "The section discussing the financial projections was intentionally omitted from the report to maintain confidentiality."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

The fantastical final chapter of the book, which involves a time warp and a character who transmogrifies into a lizard, was intentionally omitted from the original version and published at Lindsay's request three years after her death.

The Guardian

Therefore, examination for BVDV antigen and BVDV antibodies was intentionally omitted.

BMC Veterinary Research

Thus, the recent update of the Balangero cohort (Mirabelli et al, 2008) was intentionally omitted having assessed only one of the two cancer end points.

British Journal of Cancer

A consequence was that primary care became the default mental health provider for patients who refused substance abuse treatment unless the disorder was intentionally omitted from the mental health consult.

BMC Health Services Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

The high classical Parthenon sculptures taken out of Greece by Lord Elgin and now in the British Museum are intentionally omitted, as examples of plunder rather than archaeology.

The New York Times - Books

Those unaddressed model risks reflect material information (MI) that is classified as confidential supervisory information (CSI) by federal bank regulations, and consequently is intentionally omitted from public disclosure for large DIHCs although it is disclosed for small DIHCs.

Harvard University

In our design, this amplifier is intentionally omitted since we assume that the low SRO oscillation amplitudes may efficiently reduce the level of undesired emissions.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Many aspects that make a model very general have been intentionally omitted in the RCM in order to reduce complexity, for example, a dedicated path loss calculation, or a description of general environments.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Or maybe they were intentionally omitted.

Huffington Post

They have been slightly tweaked, while others have been intentionally omitted (because nothing in that section has been revised).

Huffington Post

In fact, one might infer that Flynn may have been intentionally omitted or comments made in the opposit, for the sake of making he or others being closely watched by law enforcement and intelligence agencies to feel even more secure to act.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was intentionally omitted" to clearly indicate that something was deliberately left out, ensuring transparency and avoiding potential misunderstandings. This phrase is particularly useful in academic papers, reports, and official documents where clarity is essential.

Common error

While "was intentionally omitted" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make your writing sound vague or indirect. Consider rephrasing the sentence in active voice when appropriate for a more direct and impactful statement. For example, instead of "The section was intentionally omitted", you could say "We intentionally omitted the section".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was intentionally omitted" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something was deliberately excluded. As noted by Ludwig, it clearly expresses a conscious choice to leave something out. This contrasts with accidental omissions, emphasizing purposefulness.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

37%

Academia

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was intentionally omitted" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase that indicates a deliberate act of exclusion. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. While "was intentionally omitted" is most frequently found in scientific and news contexts, it maintains a neutral to formal tone. When using this phrase, ensure clarity and transparency to avoid potential misunderstandings. If aiming for a more direct tone, consider rephrasing in the active voice. Alternatives like "was deliberately left out" or "was purposely excluded" can offer subtle variations in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was deliberately left out

Emphasizes the conscious choice to exclude something, focusing on the act of leaving it out.

was purposely excluded

Highlights the existence of a specific purpose or reason behind the exclusion.

was consciously excluded

Focuses on the awareness and intention behind the act of omission.

was selectively removed

Indicates that the removal was not random but based on specific criteria or selection.

was strategically excluded

Suggests that the omission was part of a larger strategy or plan.

was knowingly excluded

Highlights the knowledge and understanding of the person or entity making the omission.

was designedly left out

Implies a calculated or planned approach to leaving something out.

was purposefully not included

Stresses the active decision to exclude something from being included.

was specifically excluded

Indicates a precise and targeted act of excluding something.

was carefully excluded

Emphasizes the level of attention and consideration given to the act of omission.

FAQs

How can I use "was intentionally omitted" in a sentence?

The phrase "was intentionally omitted" indicates that something was deliberately left out. For example: "The detailed methodology section "was intentionally omitted" from the public report to protect proprietary information."

What are some alternatives to "was intentionally omitted"?

You can use alternatives like "was deliberately left out", "was purposely excluded", or "was consciously excluded" to convey a similar meaning, depending on the context and nuance you want to express.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when saying something was left out?

Using the active voice can make your writing more direct and clear. Instead of "The data "was intentionally omitted"", you could say "We intentionally omitted the data". The passive voice, however, can be useful when the actor is unknown or unimportant.

What's the difference between "was intentionally omitted" and "was accidentally omitted"?

"Was intentionally omitted" indicates a deliberate decision to exclude something, while "was accidentally omitted" means something was left out unintentionally. The former implies a conscious choice, while the latter suggests an oversight or mistake.