was indicted for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was indicted for" is correct and is commonly used in written English.
This phrase is usually used when someone is accused of a crime and is formally charged by the prosecution. For example: "He was indicted for fraud after an investigation by the California Attorney General's office."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Mr Jefferson was indicted for bribery on June 4th.

The Economist

Casey, the ex-cop, was indicted for murder.

The New Yorker

He was indicted for assault, sodomy and child endangerment.

The New York Times - Magazine

The investigator was indicted for perjury and planting evidence.

The New York Times

In September of 2010, Herojit was indicted for murder.

The Guardian

In November of 1996, Newey was indicted for manslaughter.

The New Yorker

In early December, Bierenbaum was indicted for murdering his wife.

The New Yorker

Gotovina was indicted for war crimes in 2001.

The Guardian

In March the former chief executive of its parent company was indicted for embezzlement.

The Economist

Kirk was fired after the 1986 season, just before he was indicted for income tax evasion.

The New York Times - Sports

She was indicted for mailing materials advocating birth control, but the charges were dropped in 1916.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was indicted for" to denote a formal legal accusation, ensuring clarity and precision in legal or journalistic contexts. For example, "The CEO was indicted for fraud after a thorough investigation."

Common error

Avoid using "was indicted for" interchangeably with "was convicted of". Indictment is a formal accusation, while conviction signifies a guilty verdict.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was indicted for" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that someone has been formally charged with a crime. Ludwig's examples illustrate its use in various contexts, from political corruption to financial crimes.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Encyclopedias

15%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Science

2%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was indicted for" is a common and grammatically correct way to express that someone has been formally accused of a crime by a grand jury. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is widely used in various contexts, particularly in news and media, encyclopedias, and wiki sources. While an indictment is a serious legal step, it's important to remember that it is merely an accusation, not a conviction. Related phrases, such as "was charged with" or "faced charges of", can provide alternative ways to express similar legal situations, though with slightly different nuances. When writing, ensure you're using "was indicted for" accurately to denote a formal legal charge, distinguishing it from arrest or conviction.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was formally accused of

Emphasizes the official nature of the accusation.

was charged with

Indicates the specific accusations made against someone, often preceding the formal indictment.

was named in the indictment for

Specifies inclusion in a formal list of accusations.

was accused of

Implies a broader allegation, not necessarily a formal legal charge.

was arraigned on charges of

Refers to the formal reading of charges in court.

faced charges of

Highlights the confrontation with accusations, emphasizing the legal process.

is facing allegations of

Highlights current accusations that have not necessarily led to indictment.

was prosecuted for

Focuses on the legal action taken against someone, emphasizing the trial process.

was booked on suspicion of

Specifies the initial stage of legal process following an arrest.

stood trial for

Indicates the individual went through a trial process regarding accusations.

FAQs

How is "was indicted for" used in a sentence?

The phrase "was indicted for" is used to indicate that someone has been formally accused of a crime by a grand jury. For example, "The senator "was indicted for" bribery and corruption".

What's the difference between "was indicted for" and "was arrested for"?

"Was arrested for" means someone was taken into custody, while ""was indicted for"" means a grand jury has formally accused someone of a crime. An arrest can happen before an indictment.

What are some synonyms for "was indicted for"?

Alternatives to ""was indicted for"" include "was charged with", "was formally accused of", or "faced charges of", depending on the context.

Can someone be indicted without being guilty?

Yes, an indictment is merely a formal accusation. It's up to the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt during a trial. Being "was indicted for" does not automatically mean the person is guilty.