Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was inadequate

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was inadequate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that did not meet the necessary standards or requirements in a particular context. Example: "The funding provided for the project was inadequate, leading to delays in its completion."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Contraception was inadequate.

The Democratic response was inadequate.

News & Media

The New York Times

Healthcare was inadequate.

News & Media

The Guardian

Cole was inadequate.

News & Media

The New York Times

Prewar planning was "inadequate".

I thought I was inadequate".

Their flavor, he said, was "inadequate".

News & Media

The New Yorker

The light in the house was inadequate.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Its staffing and funding was inadequate.

Dr. Cooperman said that was inadequate.

News & Media

The New York Times

But Democrats said that was inadequate.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was inadequate", ensure you clearly state what the subject was inadequate for. Providing context enhances clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was inadequate" without specifying what standard or requirement was not met. For instance, instead of saying "The response was inadequate", specify, "The response was inadequate to address the immediate needs of the victims".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was inadequate" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the state or condition of a noun in the past tense. As Ludwig AI highlights, it expresses that something did not meet the required standard or expectation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Science

24%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was inadequate" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to describe something failing to meet requirements or expectations. Ludwig AI confirms its broad applicability. It is most commonly found in News & Media and Science contexts. For effective use, ensure you provide specific context regarding what standard or requirement wasn't met. Consider using alternatives like "proved insufficient" or "fell short" to add nuance to your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "was inadequate" in a sentence?

Use "was inadequate" to describe something that didn't meet a required standard or expectation. For example, "The funding "was inadequate" to support the research project".

What are some alternatives to "was inadequate"?

You can use alternatives such as "was insufficient", "fell short", or "was lacking" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "was inadequate"?

Yes, it's grammatically correct. "Was" is the past tense of "be", and "inadequate" is an adjective describing the subject. It correctly indicates a state of insufficiency in the past.

What's the difference between "was inadequate" and "was insufficient"?

While similar, "was inadequate" suggests a general lack of suitability or quality, whereas "was insufficient" specifically indicates that something wasn't enough in quantity or amount.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: