Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was improved from
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was improved from" is correct and can be used in written English.
For example: The environment at the workplace was improved from last year.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(7)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The mean Harris hip score was improved from 41 to 95.
Science
Especially, the IC50 of peptide (CAcaC29 2 was improved from 49.02 (monomeric form) to 5.71 nM.
Particularly, capacity retention was improved from 81to91%1% at a high 1 C rate.
Thus, the reaction section was improved from 16% yield to 18%.
The forming limit ratio of the re-penetration process was improved from 2.70 to 2.97.
Turbine efficiency was improved from 81.3% obtained from 1-D modelling to 84.5% obtained by CFD.
Science
As Vb increased from 50 to 260 V, hardness was improved from 10to2626 GPa.
The DSSC efficiency was improved from 4.76 to 6.03% with the LPD-SiO2 AR coating.
Hudson County had the highest vacancy rate in the state at 9.5percentt, but that was improved from the 13.5 percent at the end of 2001.
News & Media
Indeed, veteran retailing executives and analysts said that, while store turnout was improved from a year ago, they had never seen the American consumer shop so strategically.
News & Media
As a result, the maximum angle of the inclined structure was improved from 38.7° (in air) to 56.2° (in water).
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was improved from", ensure the context clearly identifies both the initial state and the resulting improvement. Quantifiable data can strengthen the impact of your statement.
Common error
Avoid using "was improved from" without specifying how the subject was improved and providing specific metrics or details. Generic statements lack impact and can be misinterpreted.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was improved from" functions as a passive verb construction indicating that something has undergone a positive change or enhancement compared to a previous state. Ludwig examples show its use in various scientific, news, and general contexts.
Frequent in
Science
65%
News & Media
20%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Wiki
3%
Encyclopedias
1%
Reference
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "was improved from" serves to indicate a positive change or enhancement when comparing the current state of something to a prior state. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s grammatically correct and commonly used across scientific, news, and business contexts. To use the phrase effectively, it's important to clearly specify what has been improved and, ideally, to provide quantitative data or specific details about the improvement. Common mistakes include vague claims without proper support. Alternatives like "showed improvement from" or "progressed from" can provide different nuances while conveying similar meaning. This phrase is a useful tool for clearly communicating advancements and progress.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
showed improvement from
Replaces the passive voice with an active voice construction, focusing on the subject that demonstrated the improvement.
saw gains from
Uses a more concise and direct verb ("saw") to indicate the positive change originating from a specific starting point.
progressed from
Emphasizes the gradual development and advancement from an earlier condition.
advanced from
Highlights the movement forward from a less developed or sophisticated state.
developed positively from
More descriptive, adding an adverb to explicitly state the positive nature of the development from a prior state.
enhanced from
Uses a different verb to describe the improvement, focusing on the intensification of desirable qualities.
increased from
Focuses specifically on the quantitative aspect of improvement, indicating a rise in value or amount.
rose from
Similar to "increased from", but uses a more dynamic verb to convey the upward movement from a starting point.
grew from
Suggests a more organic and gradual process of improvement, implying natural development.
evolved from
Implies a more significant and transformative change from an earlier form or state.
FAQs
How can I use "was improved from" in a sentence?
Use "was improved from" to show a change from a previous state. For example, "The system's efficiency "was improved from" 30% to 50% after the upgrade."
What are some alternatives to "was improved from"?
You can use alternatives like "showed improvement from", "progressed from", or "enhanced from", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to say "improved from" or "was improved from"?
"Improved from" is active, while "was improved from" is passive. Using "was improved from" is appropriate when the subject receiving the improvement is the focus. For example, "The product design "was improved from" customer feedback."
What is the difference between "improved from" and "better than"?
"Improved from" indicates a change over time or after an intervention, while "better than" is a comparison between two different things or states. For example, "The new model is "better than" the old one" vs. "The new model's performance "was improved from" last year's model."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested