was implicated by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was implicated by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing someone's involvement or association with a particular situation, often in a negative context, such as a crime or scandal. Example: "The investigation revealed that he was implicated by several witnesses in the fraud case."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

La Foca, he says, was implicated by his workmate's confession.

The Guardian

However, these findings were ultimately overturned by a military prison official who was implicated by the report.

The Guardian

Mr. Salinas was convicted after he was implicated by a man who was accused of hiring the gunman.

The New York Times

Davis was implicated by another man, Sylvester Coles, present at the time.

The Guardian

No Fourth Amendment interest was implicated by this conduct because the opening of the packages cannot be attributed to the Government and considered a governmental search.

Cornell University

Intermolecular interaction between ion complexes and gelator aggregates was implicated by the data obtained and suggested as the origin of the conductivity enhancement effect.

Electrochimica Acta

In 1969, after an F.B.I. stakeout at John F. Kennedy Airport, Gotti was implicated by witnesses in three cargo thefts and truck hijackings.

The New York Times - Magazine

The list excluded several prominent names, most notably the former military commander, General Wiranto, who was implicated by an earlier fact-finding commission.

The New York Times

Malinski was implicated by various witnesses—by Spielfogel, an old friend and a criminal serving a sentence of thirty to sixty years in Sing Sing; by Malinski's girl friend; by Malinski's brother-in-law.

Cornell University

Mr. Landano, who at trial was implicated by co-defendants, was sentenced to life plus 15 years, and in the following decade he became a jailhouse lawyer, according to Neil Mullin, his longtime lawyer.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Given that such tribes' survival depended on immediate reaction to quickly, albeit crudely evaluated visual stimuli, amygdalar visual processing was implicated, by-passing detailed cortical parieto occipital evaluation.

Aggression and Violent Behavior

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was implicated by" when you want to suggest that someone or something is connected to a negative event, but you don't have definitive proof. It's a way to raise suspicion without making a direct accusation.

Common error

Avoid using "was implicated by" excessively in your writing, as it can make your sentences sound convoluted and weaken the impact of your message. Consider using active voice constructions for clearer and more direct communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was implicated by" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject was connected to something, often a crime or scandal, through the actions or statements of someone or something else. Ludwig highlights its usage in various news reports and academic contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Science

23%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was implicated by" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction that suggests a connection or involvement, often in a negative context, without making a direct accusation. Ludwig's AI confirms its usability and provides numerous examples from reputable sources like The New York Times, The Guardian, and scientific journals. Its usage is common in news reporting, academic research, and formal writing. When using this phrase, consider whether active voice might be more direct. Alternatives include phrases such as "was linked to" or "was associated with", depending on the intended nuance. The phrase serves to raise suspicion or indicate a link based on indirect evidence, testimonies, or associations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was linked to

Focuses on a connection or association, often suggesting a relationship rather than direct involvement.

was associated with

Implies a connection or relationship, which might not necessarily be negative or incriminating.

was connected with

Highlights a direct link or relationship, often suggesting a more tangible connection.

was tied to

Suggests a strong and undeniable connection, often implying a close relationship or dependency.

was involved in

Indicates active participation or engagement in a particular activity or event.

was attributed to

Indicates that something is believed to be the cause or origin of something else.

was traced to

Focuses on the origin or source of something, often implying an investigation or search.

was determined by

Highlights the cause-and-effect relationship, where something is a direct result of something else.

was influenced by

Implies that something had an effect on someone or something, shaping its actions or outcomes.

was affected by

Suggests that someone or something was impacted or changed by a particular event or circumstance.

FAQs

How can I use "was implicated by" in a sentence?

You can use "was implicated by" to suggest someone is connected to a negative situation without direct accusation. For example, "The suspect "was implicated by" witness testimony but not definitively proven guilty."

What are some alternatives to saying "was implicated by"?

Alternatives include "was linked to", "was associated with", or "was involved in", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was implicated by"?

While "was implicated by" is in passive voice, consider whether active voice might be more direct. For example, instead of "He was implicated by the evidence", you could say "The evidence implicated him."

What's the difference between "was implicated by" and "was accused by"?

"Was accused by" suggests a formal charge or accusation. "Was implicated by" suggests involvement or connection to something, often negative, based on circumstantial evidence or indirect suggestion, without a formal charge. Think of it as being under suspicion rather than formally charged.