was identified using

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was identified using" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the method or process by which something was recognized or determined in a specific context, such as research or analysis. Example: "The species was identified using genetic sequencing techniques."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He was identified using DNA samples taken from parents.

The Guardian

This patient was identified using the Learns tool, then diagnosed and successfully treated.

The Guardian

(c) The 11-gene module was identified using the Clique Percolation Method (k = 5).

Nature

Differential expression of miRNAs was identified using a linear model approach (limma, Bioconductor analysis suite57).

Nature

Tandem repeats in the genome assembly was identified using TRF49 (version 4.0.4).

Nature

Fabric surface etching was identified using FESEM analysis.

Carbohydrate Polymers

The 200 kDa neurofilament protein was identified using immunoblotting.

Toxicology

In experiments measuring subcellular localization of fluorescent proteins, the nucleus was identified using cell-permeable nuclear markers (Hoechst 33342, Sigma).

Nature

The community structure of the parcellated connectome was identified using Infomap clustering across sessions to generate a consensus clustering8.

Nature

Hepatocyte formation was identified using an antibody against the human hepatic cell marker Hnf4α (1 200; Cell Signalling, 3113).

Nature

Diabetes mellitus was identified using standardized criteria.

Duke University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was identified using", ensure the method or tool you're referencing is clearly defined and relevant to the context. This enhances clarity and credibility.

Common error

While "was identified using" is grammatically sound, overuse of passive voice can make your writing sound weak. Consider rephrasing to active voice where appropriate to strengthen your message. For example, instead of "The problem was identified using X", try "X identified the problem".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was identified using" functions as a passive construction indicating the method by which something was recognized or determined. As noted by Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and widely employed. It emphasizes the tool or process used for identification.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

Academia

15%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was identified using" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed construction, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It serves the function of passively describing the method through which something was recognized or determined. Its primary purpose is to convey the methodology used, predominantly in formal and scientific contexts. While versatile, it's essential to be mindful of potential overuse of the passive voice and to ensure the specified method is clearly relevant to the context. Consider active voice alternatives for a more direct style.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was detected via

Emphasizes the means of detection rather than the identification process itself.

was determined through

Highlights the process of determination, often implying a detailed analysis.

was recognized by means of

A more formal way of saying something was identified, emphasizing the tool or method used.

was ascertained via

Implies a degree of certainty in the identification, often through investigation.

was classified with

Focuses on the act of classification as a result of using a particular method.

was diagnosed by

Specifically used in medical contexts, indicating a diagnosis through a method or tool.

was pinpointed by

Suggests a precise identification, often after eliminating other possibilities.

was unveiled through

Implies that the identification revealed something previously unknown.

was uncovered using

Similar to 'unveiled', suggesting the discovery of something hidden.

was distinguished via

Highlights the act of differentiating something from others using a specific method.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "was identified using" to sound more active?

Consider using active voice constructions like "[Method/Tool] identified [Subject]" or "Researchers identified [Subject] with [Method/Tool]". This often makes the sentence more direct and engaging.

What are some alternatives to "was identified using" that maintain a formal tone?

Alternatives such as "was determined through" or "was ascertained via" provide a similar level of formality while varying your phrasing.

Is it always necessary to specify the method when saying something "was identified"?

While not always mandatory, specifying the method or tool used for identification adds credibility and clarity to your statement. It allows the reader to understand how the identification was achieved.

How does "was identified using" differ from "was discovered using"?

"Was identified using" implies a recognition or determination of something already existing, while "was discovered using" suggests the finding of something previously unknown. The choice depends on whether you're highlighting recognition or discovery.