Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was identified from

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was identified from" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating the source or origin of a particular identification or finding, often in research or scientific contexts. Example: "The new species was identified from samples collected in the Amazon rainforest."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Vera's body was identified from the traditional dress she had worn for the planned folk dance.

News & Media

The Guardian

David was identified from tattoos on his left wrist and shoulder.

News & Media

The New Yorker

A police commander who was the son of an influential army general was identified from the video.

News & Media

The New York Times

Ms Rausing was identified from a thumb print and the serial number of a pacemaker fitted six years earlier.

News & Media

The Guardian

Khan's vehicle was identified from CCTV footage and he was arrested at his home two days later.

News & Media

The Guardian

Klebsiella pneumoniae was identified from the culture of the ascites.

An interesting mutation (G276R) was identified from those cloned mutants.

In this study, Bosea thiooxidans was identified from 'wasta' sample.

Peripheral neuropathy was identified from chart review and self-report.

Neuropeptide Y was identified from leeches for the first time.

The spontaneous mutant, gns4, was identified from japonica rice Zhonghua 11C (ZH11C).

Science

Rice
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was identified from", ensure that the source of identification is clearly and explicitly stated to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was identified from" without specifying the method or data used for identification. For instance, instead of saying "The problem was identified from data", specify "The problem was identified from sensor data analysis."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was identified from" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something was recognized or determined based on a particular source. It's commonly used to attribute the basis of an identification to specific data, evidence, or methods, as confirmed by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

71%

News & Media

27%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was identified from" is a common and grammatically sound passive construction used to indicate the source or basis of an identification. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is predominantly used in scientific and news-related contexts, maintaining a formal and objective tone. To enhance clarity, specify the source or method used for identification. Related phrases include "was determined by" and "was derived from", each offering slightly different nuances. Common errors involve failing to clearly state the identification source.

FAQs

How can I use "was identified from" in a sentence?

Use "was identified from" to indicate the source or method through which something was recognized or determined. For example, "The suspect "was identified from CCTV footage"."

What are some alternatives to "was identified from"?

Alternatives include "was determined by", "was ascertained through", or "was derived from", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "identify"?

While passive voice is often used in scientific writing, active voice can sometimes be more direct and clearer. For example, instead of "The cause was identified from the data", you could say "Researchers identified the cause from the data".

What's the difference between "was identified from" and "was identified by"?

"Was identified from" indicates the source of information or data used for identification, while "was identified by" indicates the agent or entity that performed the identification. For example, "The error "was identified from the logs"" versus "The error "was identified by the analyst"".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: