was hurled

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was hurled" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe an action where something was thrown with force or intensity, often in a dramatic context. Example: "The stone was hurled across the lake, creating a large splash."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

A package was hurled over.

The New York Times

Bonnets were banged, abuse was hurled.

Independent

Moore was hurled off the back.

The New York Times - Sports

Nothing was hurled at the TV.

The Guardian - Sport

"I was hurled into the air.

The New York Times

Mr. Camitz was hurled into the air.

The New York Times

A firebomb was hurled into another synagogue, in Berlin.

The Economist

Calhoun hit a pothole and was hurled over the handlebars.

The New York Times

Bryant was hurled violently back to the planet tonight, though.

The New York Times - Sports

Sixteen seconds later, he was hurled headfirst in their direction.

The New York Times

Debris was hurled hundreds of feet, Ms. Facciarossa said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was hurled" to describe actions where an object or person is thrown with significant force or violence, often resulting in a dramatic impact or displacement. This conveys a sense of intensity and lack of control.

Common error

Avoid using "was hurled" in everyday situations where a simpler verb like "thrown" or "passed" would suffice. Overusing the phrase can diminish its impact and make your writing sound melodramatic.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was hurled" functions as a passive verb construction. It indicates that the subject of the sentence received the action of being thrown forcefully. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was hurled" is a grammatically sound passive verb phrase used to describe a forceful throwing action, often with violent or dramatic implications. Ludwig AI indicates its correctness and widespread use. While its intensity makes it unsuitable for casual contexts, it's commonly found in news and media, as well as other sources that require describing forceful movement. Remember to reserve this phrase for situations where the force and impact are significant, avoiding overuse in mundane contexts. When a less impactful phrase is required, consider using "was thrown" as a substitute.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was thrown with force

Emphasizes the action of throwing but includes the element of force, making it similar in meaning.

was propelled violently

Highlights the violent propulsion of something, rather than just the act of throwing. It implies greater force and lack of control.

was launched forcefully

Focuses on the act of launching, which suggests a planned or deliberate throwing action with considerable power.

was sent flying

Indicates that something was caused to fly through the air, often due to an impact or explosion.

was ejected powerfully

Implies a forced expulsion or ejection, suggesting a mechanical or explosive cause.

was cast forcefully

Similar to "was thrown", but implies a more deliberate and perhaps theatrical action.

was discharged rapidly

Highlights a quick and forceful release or discharge of something.

was flung with great intensity

Emphasizes the intensity with which something was thrown, rather than simply the fact that it was thrown.

was knocked back

Describes the result of something being thrown at someone or something, causing them to move backwards.

was displaced abruptly

Focuses on the sudden displacement of an object or person, often due to an external force.

FAQs

What does "was hurled" mean?

"Was hurled" means something was thrown with great force or violence. It often implies a lack of control and a significant impact.

When is it appropriate to use "was hurled" in a sentence?

It's appropriate when describing a forceful throwing action that results in a dramatic impact or displacement. For instance, "The rock "was hurled" through the window" conveys more intensity than "The rock was thrown through the window".

What are some alternatives to "was hurled"?

You can use alternatives like "was thrown", "was propelled", or "was flung", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How does "was hurled" differ from "was thrown"?

"Was hurled" implies greater force and a more violent action than "was thrown". "Was hurled" suggests a powerful, uncontrolled movement, while "was thrown" can refer to a simple, controlled throwing action.