Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was highly significant

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was highly significant" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that had a great importance or impact in a particular context or situation. Example: "The discovery of the new species was highly significant for the field of biology, as it provided insights into evolutionary processes."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This was highly significant.

News & Media

The Guardian

"It was highly significant.

His speech was highly significant.

News & Media

The Guardian

Heterogeneity was highly significant.

The difference was highly significant (P =.0053).

The difference was highly significant (P < .001).001

Convergent validity of the SS-DSM5 was highly significant.

With a monthly reach of 6 million viewers, he said Sky Arts was "highly significant".

News & Media

The Guardian

Yet I'm pretty sure that it was highly significant, the photograph being tweeted at that time.

All told, the impact of changing the HOV policy was highly significant.

The Phi test for recombination was highly significant (P = 1 × 10−6).

Science & Research

Nature
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was highly significant" to emphasize the importance of a result or finding in a clear and concise manner, particularly in scientific or academic writing. Ensure that the context clearly establishes what makes the subject significant.

Common error

Avoid using "was highly significant" when the context does not warrant such a strong emphasis. Ensure that the evidence supports the claim and that the significance is clearly demonstrated, not merely asserted. Consider using less emphatic alternatives if the significance is not truly exceptional.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was highly significant" functions as a declarative statement emphasizing the importance or statistical relevance of something. It typically follows a subject and links it to a state of notable importance. Ludwig confirms its common usage in expressing impactful findings or events.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

72%

News & Media

22%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was highly significant" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to denote the noteworthy importance or statistical relevance of a subject. Ludwig's analysis of numerous real-world examples reveals its common use in scientific, academic, and news contexts. While alternatives exist, the choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Remember to use this phrase judiciously, ensuring that the context supports such a strong emphasis. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's validity and provides valuable insights into its usage.

FAQs

How can I use "was highly significant" in a sentence?

You can use "was highly significant" to emphasize the importance or impact of a particular event, result, or finding. For example, "The study's finding "was highly significant" for future research."

What are some alternatives to "was highly significant"?

Alternatives include "was very important", "was extremely significant", or "held considerable importance", depending on the context and the degree of emphasis you want to convey.

Is it better to say "was highly significant" or "was very significant"?

"Was highly significant" and "was very significant" are both acceptable, but "was highly significant" often implies a statistical or technical importance, while "was very significant" is more general. Choose the option that best fits the context.

What does it mean when a statistical result "was highly significant"?

In statistics, if something "was highly significant", it means that the result is unlikely to have occurred by chance and represents a real effect. It usually implies a p-value less than 0.01.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: