Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was guaranteed to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was guaranteed to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was assured or promised to happen in the past. Example: "The project was guaranteed to succeed with the right resources and support."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Not one dollar was guaranteed to New York.

News & Media

The New York Times

You just waited there, and something was guaranteed to happen.

News & Media

The New Yorker

My Arctic wrap was guaranteed to handle 50 below.

A TechCrunch conference was guaranteed to be a hit.

News & Media

TechCrunch

Confidentiality was guaranteed to participants.

Anonymity was guaranteed to all the study participants.

He is guaranteed to be hired.

News & Media

The New York Times

Third is guaranteeing to be in it.

News & Media

Independent

It is guaranteed to impress the world.

News & Media

The Economist

None is guaranteed to work indefinitely.

News & Media

The Economist

You're guaranteed to make new friends.

News & Media

Independent
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was guaranteed to" when you want to emphasize a certainty or assurance about a past event or situation. Be mindful of the context to ensure it accurately reflects the level of assurance.

Common error

Avoid overusing passive voice with "was guaranteed to", as it can sometimes obscure who or what provided the guarantee. Opt for active voice when clarity is crucial.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was guaranteed to" functions as a verb phrase indicating a past assurance or certainty. This is based on Ludwig AI information and observed in examples such as "Not one dollar was guaranteed to New York" and "Confidentiality was guaranteed to participants".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was guaranteed to" is a verb phrase used to express a past assurance or certainty. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage across various contexts, particularly in news, science, and formal business settings. While alternatives like "was certain to" or "was assured to" exist, "was guaranteed to" effectively conveys a sense of reliability. When using this phrase, ensure the context accurately reflects the level of assurance and avoid overuse of passive voice. Its frequency and presence in authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian underscore its legitimacy in both formal and informal communication.

FAQs

How can I use "was guaranteed to" in a sentence?

You can use "was guaranteed to" to indicate a past certainty or assurance. For example, "The funding "was guaranteed to" be available by the end of the quarter."

What are some alternatives to "was guaranteed to"?

Some alternatives include "was certain to", "was assured to", or "was bound to", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "is guaranteed to" instead of "was guaranteed to"?

The choice between "is guaranteed to" and "was guaranteed to" depends on the time frame you're referring to. Use "is" for present or future assurances and "was" for past assurances.

What is the difference between "was guaranteed to" and "was expected to"?

"Was guaranteed to" implies a firm assurance or promise, while "was expected to" suggests an anticipation or likelihood without a firm commitment. The first carries a higher degree of certainty.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: