Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was fully validated
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was fully validated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the confirmation or verification of something, such as a process, result, or data. Example: "The research findings were submitted for peer review and were fully validated by the experts in the field."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
44 human-written examples
Our implementation was fully validated against the official validation suite provided by the MMFF authors.
Science
The assay was fully validated according to the guidelines for validation of analytical procedures and the results were satisfactory.
Science
In addition, the automated method was fully validated according to Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP) guidelines, including the validation parameters accuracy, precision, robustness and specificity.
Academia
This application was fully validated comparing the results with the experimental measurements.
The method was fully validated and it demonstrated acceptable accuracy, precision, linearity, and specificity.
Science
The method was fully validated and successfully applied to the clinical pharmacokinetic study of R-salbutamol in healthy volunteers.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
16 human-written examples
Three of the four methods are fully validated and the validation is successful.
Science
Screening methods were fully validated in accordance with the WADA Code of validation for urine and plasma which was extended to hair samples.
Science
Although this validation was generally successful, some of the methylation measurements could not be fully validated.
Science
The method has been fully validated and is linear down to 0.01 μg ml−1.
Science
And, let me add, the coolest – and most important – thing is that our computational analyses are fully validated in chemical practice.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was fully validated", ensure the context clearly indicates the criteria or standards against which the validation was performed. This provides transparency and strengthens the credibility of your statement.
Common error
Avoid claiming something "was fully validated" without providing specific details or evidence of the validation process. This can weaken your argument and raise questions about the thoroughness of your work.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was fully validated" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject (e.g., a method, a result, or a process) has undergone and successfully passed a validation process. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a standard and correct construction.
Frequent in
Science
88%
Academia
8%
Formal & Business
2%
Less common in
News & Media
2%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was fully validated" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, primarily in scientific and academic writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, it indicates that something has undergone a thorough process of verification and meets specific criteria for accuracy and reliability. When using this phrase, it's best practice to specify the validation criteria to enhance credibility. Be careful not to overstate validation without providing sufficient evidence. Alternatives such as "was thoroughly verified" or "was completely confirmed" can be used to convey a similar meaning. Ludwig's examples showcase the phrase's application in diverse scientific contexts, confirming its relevance and correctness.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was thoroughly verified
Emphasizes the verification process using "thoroughly" instead of "fully".
was completely confirmed
Replaces "validated" with "confirmed" and "fully" with "completely".
underwent complete validation
Shifts the sentence structure to focus on the process of validation rather than the state.
received comprehensive validation
Substitutes "fully" with "comprehensive" and uses "received" to describe the validation.
has been rigorously tested
Replaces "validated" with "tested" and adds the emphasis of "rigorously".
has been officially certified
Replaces "validated" with "certified" and indicates the validation was made by an authority.
demonstrated acceptable accuracy
Focuses on the outcome of validation: acceptable accuracy.
met all validation criteria
Focuses on meeting specific criteria during the validation process.
successfully passed validation
Highlights the successful completion of a validation process.
its validity was established
Changes the structure to emphasize the establishment of validity.
FAQs
What does "was fully validated" mean?
The phrase "was fully validated" means that something has been thoroughly checked and confirmed to meet certain standards or criteria, ensuring its accuracy and reliability.
How can I use "was fully validated" in a sentence?
You can use "was fully validated" to describe methods, results, or processes. For example, "The assay method "was fully validated" according to the ICH guidelines."
What can I say instead of "was fully validated"?
You can use alternatives like "was thoroughly verified", "was completely confirmed", or "underwent complete validation" depending on the context.
Is it necessary to specify the validation criteria when using "was fully validated"?
While not always mandatory, specifying the validation criteria adds credibility and transparency. Providing details about the validation process helps the reader understand the rigor applied and the specific standards met.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested