was fully reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was fully reviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been thoroughly examined or assessed, often in the context of documents, reports, or processes. Example: "The proposal was fully reviewed by the committee before making a decision."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Each full-text article, or included abstract where applicable, was fully reviewed and coded for pertinent citation, study level, treatment, and outcome variables by the primary author.

Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

A spokeswoman from St . Marys Hospital in St. Louis told the newspaper that the article was posted prematurely before it was fully reviewed.

Huffington Post

However, in this work merlin's automatic annotation was fully reviewed to maximize the re-annotation confidence.

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

"This case is in the process of being fully reviewed.

The Guardian

Children's entertainment legislation has not been fully reviewed since 1968.

The Guardian

They had not been fully reviewed by The Times by Friday night.

The New York Times

The firm expressed confidence that Secretary Jackson would approve the deal when all the issues are fully reviewed.

The New York Times

New research nationwide has found that nearly 70percentt of capital cases that were fully reviewed were found to have reversible error.

The New York Times

"We plan to ask for an expedited hearing so the enormous benefits of this merger can be fully reviewed.

The New York Times

Eric Keszler, spokesman for the Wyoming Game and Fish Department said, "Obviously we are disappointed in the decision," which he said had not yet been fully reviewed.

The New York Times

The regulator said it was still determining the number of reviews completed, but the consultants said that only a third of the loans were fully reviewed.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was fully reviewed", ensure that the context clearly indicates who conducted the review and what criteria were used. This adds clarity and credibility to your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "was fully reviewed" without specifying who performed the review. The passive voice can obscure accountability, so consider rephrasing to an active voice to identify the reviewer.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was fully reviewed" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject received a comprehensive examination. Ludwig examples show its use in describing the assessment of articles and cases.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33.3%

News & Media

66.7%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was fully reviewed" is a grammatically correct passive construction used to indicate that something has undergone a thorough examination. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. While relatively rare in frequency, it appears in contexts ranging from scientific articles to news reports. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying who conducted the review and what criteria were applied. Alternatives such as "was thoroughly examined" or "underwent a complete review" can provide similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was given a full review

Simplifies 'fully reviewed' to 'given a full review', maintaining the same meaning but with slightly different wording.

was thoroughly examined

Substitutes 'fully reviewed' with 'thoroughly examined', focusing on the depth of the inspection.

was subject to a detailed review

Rephrases the sentence structure, using 'subject to a detailed review' to convey the same meaning.

underwent a complete review

Replaces 'fully reviewed' with 'complete review' and uses the verb 'underwent' to describe the action.

was rigorously checked

Replaces 'fully reviewed' with 'rigorously checked', stressing the thoroughness and strictness of the review process.

was comprehensively assessed

Replaces 'fully reviewed' with 'comprehensively assessed', highlighting the assessment aspect.

was extensively evaluated

Replaces 'fully reviewed' with 'extensively evaluated', stressing the evaluation process.

was carefully inspected

Replaces 'fully reviewed' with 'carefully inspected', emphasizing the attention to detail during the review.

was completely scrutinized

Uses 'completely scrutinized' instead of 'fully reviewed', emphasizing a detailed and critical examination.

was critically analyzed

Substitutes 'fully reviewed' with 'critically analyzed', highlighting the analytical nature of the review.

FAQs

How can I use "was fully reviewed" in a sentence?

You can use "was fully reviewed" to indicate that something has been thoroughly examined or assessed. For example: "The report "was fully reviewed" by the committee."

What are some alternatives to using "was fully reviewed"?

Alternatives include phrases like "was thoroughly examined", "was comprehensively assessed", or "underwent a complete review".

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing a review process?

While "was fully reviewed" (passive voice) is grammatically correct, using the active voice (e.g., "The committee fully reviewed the report") can often provide more clarity and accountability.

What does "fully reviewed" imply about the review process?

"Fully reviewed" suggests that the subject underwent a comprehensive and detailed examination, leaving no aspect unconsidered. It implies a higher degree of scrutiny than a simple "reviewed".