was full with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was full with" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression is "was full of." Example: "The basket was full of fresh fruits and vegetables from the market."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

27 human-written examples

The restaurant was full with guests".

The New York Times

The theatre was full, with a lively crowd.

The New Yorker

He says his life was full with a new wife and new stepson.

The New York Times

The city's mayor, Dieter Reiter, said Munich was "full", with its capacities completely exhausted.

The Guardian

On a recent Saturday, the restaurant was full, with at least 12 parties waiting.

The New York Times - Food

The church was full, with a lot of young people – it doesn't look right".

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

31 human-written examples

His hands are full with the gun.

The New Yorker

ThiShortlystheted simultaneously that Williams' eyes were razor-sharp and that basesr's control were't.

The New Yorker

He added, "The hallway is full with smoke.

The New York Times

German gas-reserve tanks are full with several months' supply.

The Economist

That's great when your arms are full with, say, grocery bags.

The Guardian - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "was full of" instead of "was full with". This ensures grammatical correctness and clarity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "with" when "of" is grammatically correct. "Full" requires "of" to indicate what the subject is filled with. Using "with" creates a grammatically incorrect phrase.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was full with" functions as a descriptive phrase, aiming to convey that a subject is completely occupied or filled. However, it's grammatically incorrect. Ludwig indicates that the correct form is "was full of."

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Science

16%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Unknown/unmatched sources

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was full with" is an incorrect grammatical construction. The correct form is "was full of". While the phrase appears in some contexts, Ludwig AI points out it's not standard English. When aiming to describe a state of being completely occupied, alternatives like "was filled with" or "was packed with" are also appropriate. Therefore, always opt for "was full of" to ensure grammatical accuracy in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was filled with

Replaces "full with" with the more grammatically sound "filled with", maintaining the meaning of being occupied or containing something.

was packed with

Indicates a state of being very full, often to the point of being tightly compressed or crowded.

was brimming with

Suggests that something is so full it's on the verge of overflowing, either literally or figuratively.

was overflowing with

Similar to "brimming with", emphasizes exceeding capacity or abundance.

was abundant with

Highlights the plentiful presence of something within a space or container.

was replete with

A more formal way of saying "was full of", suggesting a rich or abundant presence.

was laden with

Implies a heavy filling, often with something that weighs down or burdens.

was crowded with

Focuses on the presence of many individuals or items in a limited space.

was teaming with

Indicates a space is full of living creatures, often used in reference to wildlife.

was bursting with

Suggests an intense fullness, implying potential release or expression.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say something was completely occupied?

The correct way to say something was completely occupied is to use the phrase "was full of". For example, "The room was full of people."

Is it grammatically correct to say "was full with"?

No, "was full with" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "was full of".

What are some alternatives to "was full of"?

Alternatives include "was filled with", "was packed with", or "was brimming with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How do I choose between "was full of" and "was filled with"?

While both are grammatically correct, "was full of" is generally more common and versatile. "was filled with" can emphasize the action of filling, but in most contexts, they are interchangeable.