Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was foreign to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was foreign to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is unfamiliar or strange to someone or something. Example: "The concept of meditation was foreign to her until she attended the workshop."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Money was foreign to me".

News & Media

The New York Times

The Aztec system was foreign to them.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was foreign to my ears.

Yet firefighting was foreign to us.

News & Media

The New York Times

There was a quota, which was foreign to me.

Everything about civilian life was foreign to me".

The notion of "loyal opposition" was foreign to him.

News & Media

The Guardian

In 1990 he became an emeritus fellow, but retirement was foreign to him.

Such nimble exploitation of a fast-moving market opportunity was foreign to the old I.B.M.

News & Media

The New York Times

Self-questioning was foreign to him; he knew who he was and reveled in it.

His credo had to be that nothing in boxing was foreign to him".

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was foreign to" to clearly indicate that a concept, experience, or object was unfamiliar to someone at a specific point in time. For example, "The idea of remote work was foreign to many companies before the pandemic."

Common error

Avoid using "foreign for" when you mean "was foreign to". "Foreign for" typically implies something is intended for a foreign country, while "was foreign to" expresses unfamiliarity. For example, instead of saying "That concept is foreign for me", say "That concept was foreign to me".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was foreign to" functions as a predicate adjective, describing a subject's lack of familiarity or experience with something. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. It essentially expresses that a concept, place, or experience was unknown or alien to someone.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Science

14%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was foreign to" effectively conveys a sense of unfamiliarity or lack of prior experience. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a grammatically sound and commonly used expression across various writing styles. Its neutral register makes it appropriate for both formal and informal contexts, particularly in news and media, where it often describes novel or unexpected situations. Remember to avoid confusion with similar-sounding phrases like "foreign for", which have different meanings. Use "was foreign to" to clearly indicate that something was unknown or alien to someone at a particular time.

FAQs

How can I use "was foreign to" in a sentence?

Use "was foreign to" to express that something was unfamiliar or unknown to someone. For example, "The concept of cryptocurrency "was foreign to" her until she started researching it."

What are some alternatives to "was foreign to"?

You can use alternatives like "was unfamiliar with", "was new to", or "was alien to" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "was foreign for" instead of "was foreign to"?

No, "was foreign for" is not typically used to express unfamiliarity. "Was foreign to" is the correct phrase when indicating that something was unknown or unfamiliar.

What's the difference between "was foreign to" and "was unusual for"?

"Was foreign to" indicates complete unfamiliarity, while "was unusual for" implies something is out of the ordinary but not necessarily unknown. For example, "Classical music "was foreign to" him" versus "Rain in July was unusual for the desert region."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: