was filed with

USAGE SUMMARY

"was filed with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe when paperwork is officially delivered to a court or other government office. For example, "The company's lawsuit was filed with the court last week."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The second patent was filed with a terminal disclaimer.

Harvard University

The plan was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The New York Times

A revised contract between Kovalchuk and the Devils was filed with the league Aug. 27.

The New York Times - Sports

An insurance claim of $7 million was filed with Lloyd's of London.

The New York Times

Manning's statement of candidacy was filed with the Federal Election Commission on Thursday.

The Washington Post

Executives at Microsoft and Google declined to comment before the report was filed with the court.

The New York Times

Her complaint was filed with the commission on Feb. 28 this year.

The New York Times

(The Kudeshkina case, for example, was filed with the European court in July 2005).

The New York Times

The lawsuit was filed with the approval of Attorney General John Ashcroft.

The New York Times

Documentary evidence to support the claim was filed with the museum on Nov. 30, she said.

The New York Times

The report, commissioned by Mr. Hewlett, was filed with his S.E.C. statement today.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was filed with", ensure clarity regarding who filed the document and with which specific entity it was filed. This enhances precision and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using alternative prepositions like "in" or "at" instead of "with" when indicating the recipient of the filed document. The correct usage is "was filed with".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was filed with" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a document, claim, or report has been formally submitted to a specific entity. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Academia

24%

Science

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

14%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was filed with" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction that indicates the formal submission of a document or claim to an authority or organization. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is appropriate for use in a variety of contexts, including news, academia, and professional settings. While alternatives like "was lodged with" and "was submitted to" exist, "was filed with" often carries a more official or legal connotation. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying who filed the document and with which entity it was filed.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was lodged with

Focuses on the act of formally depositing or presenting something.

was submitted to

Emphasizes the action of presenting something for consideration or approval.

was registered with

Highlights the official recording or enrollment of something.

was presented to

Indicates the formal introduction or submission of information.

was referred to

Suggests the act of directing or sending something to a specific entity.

was delivered to

Focuses on the physical act of transferring something to a location.

was furnished to

Highlights the provision or supplying of something.

was handed over to

Implies a transfer of responsibility or control.

was turned in to

Suggests the act of submitting something, often an assignment or report.

was directed to

Emphasizes the act of sending or pointing something towards a specific entity.

FAQs

How can I use "was filed with" in a sentence?

The phrase "was filed with" indicates that a document or claim has been formally submitted to an authority or organization. For example, "The lawsuit "was filed with" the court" or "The insurance claim "was filed with" the company".

What are some alternatives to "was filed with"?

You can use phrases like "was lodged with", "was submitted to", or "was registered with" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was filed at" instead of "was filed with"?

While "at" can sometimes be used to indicate location, "with" is the correct preposition to use when indicating the recipient or authority the document or claim was submitted to. Therefore, ""was filed with"" is the grammatically correct choice.

What's the difference between "was filed with" and "was submitted to"?

Both phrases imply the act of presenting something formally. However, ""was filed with"" often suggests a more official or legal context, whereas "was submitted to" can be used in broader contexts.