was far apart

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was far apart" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a physical or metaphorical distance between two or more entities, whether they are people, objects, or ideas. Example: "During the meeting, it became clear that our opinions on the project were far apart."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

"We're far apart.

The New York Times

But their approaches are far apart.

The New York Times

In fact, we were far apart.

The New York Times

"We were far apart, man," Minaya said.

The New York Times - Sports

ON a map, Madison Avenue and New Orleans are far apart.

The New York Times

But in policy terms Berlin and Paris are far apart.

The Economist

The books are far apart in quality, too.

The New York Times - Books

Another debate occurs when the valuations are far apart.

The New York Times

But the parties are far apart on the details.

The New York Times

The sides were said to be far apart Friday.

The New York Times - Sports

The two sides are far apart even on procedural issues.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was far apart" to clearly indicate significant differences in opinions, distances, or qualities between two or more entities. For clarity, specify the entities being compared.

Common error

Avoid using "was far apart" when a more precise term is needed to describe the nature of the distance or disagreement. Ensure the context warrants a general description of separation rather than a specific type of difference.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was far apart" functions as a descriptive phrase indicating a significant difference or distance between two or more entities. It modifies the subject by illustrating the extent of their separation, whether physical, ideological, or qualitative. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was far apart" is a grammatically sound and versatile expression used to denote a notable degree of separation or dissimilarity. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. While its frequency is relatively rare, it finds relevance across various contexts, most notably in News & Media and Science. When using this phrase, ensure the context warrants emphasizing a significant gap rather than a mere difference. Consider alternative phrases like "were widely separated" or "had significant differences" to tailor your expression to the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were widely separated

Emphasizes a significant physical or metaphorical distance.

were distant from each other

Highlights the lack of closeness or agreement between entities.

had significant differences

Focuses on the disparities and lack of alignment.

were in disagreement

Directly points out the conflicting opinions or perspectives.

were not aligned

Indicates a lack of coordination or shared goals.

were worlds apart

Emphasizes an extreme difference or separation.

were poles apart

Highlights opposite extremes or viewpoints.

were greatly divergent

Stresses the diverging nature and lack of convergence.

did not see eye to eye

Informal way to describe disagreement or differing viewpoints.

were on different wavelengths

Suggests a lack of understanding or connection.

FAQs

How can I use "was far apart" in a sentence?

You can use "was far apart" to describe significant differences between two things, such as "Their opinions on the matter "were far apart"" or to indicate physical distance, like "The two cities "were far apart"".

What is a good alternative to "was far apart"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "were widely separated", "were distant from each other", or "had significant differences" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it correct to say "were far apart" instead of "was far apart"?

The choice between "was" and "were" depends on the subject. Use "was far apart" with a singular subject and "were far apart" with a plural subject. For example, "The house "was far apart"" versus "The houses "were far apart"".

What's the difference between "was far apart" and "were very different"?

"Was far apart" implies a greater degree of separation, either physically or metaphorically, than "were very different". "Was far apart" suggests a significant gap, while "were very different" simply indicates notable dissimilarities.