was extracted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was extracted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was removed or taken out from a source or context in the past. Example: "The DNA sample was extracted from the crime scene for further analysis."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The bullet was extracted.

The New Yorker

I was extracted from them".

The New Yorker

This was extracted from hundreds of reports.

Yale University

RNA was extracted as described above.

Nature

Total protein was extracted as previously reported42.

Nature

The microarray signal was extracted using GenePix.

Nature

Finally, the retina was extracted carefully.

Nature

Total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen).

Nature

Auxin was extracted and semi-purified74.

Nature

This "essence" was extracted from Bruno with difficulty.

The Guardian - Film

Finally, Ms. Gerney was extracted without the need for amputation.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a scientific process, use "was extracted" to clearly indicate the removal of a substance from a mixture or sample.

Common error

Avoid using "was extracted" when the active voice is more appropriate and direct. For example, instead of "The scientist was extracted the DNA", use "The scientist extracted the DNA".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was extracted" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject of the sentence underwent the action of extraction. As Ludwig AI confirms, the passive construction is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

65%

News & Media

20%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was extracted" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction that indicates something has been deliberately removed or obtained from a source. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage. It is commonly found in scientific, academic, and news contexts. When writing, ensure that the active voice is not a more appropriate choice. While versatile, it's best suited for formal or technical contexts where precision is valued.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was removed

Indicates a general removal, lacking the precision of a specific extraction process.

was obtained

Suggests gaining possession or access, differing from the direct action of extracting.

was derived

Implies origination or sourcing from something else, focusing on the source rather than the extraction process.

was isolated

Highlights the separation of something from its environment, which is a key aspect of extraction.

was drawn out

Emphasizes the pulling or coaxing aspect of the extraction, implying a more gentle process.

was retrieved

Suggests a recovery or bringing back, adding a sense of prior placement or loss.

was separated

Focuses on the action of dividing or disconnecting, rather than the intentional removal.

was taken out

A more informal way of saying something was extracted, usually implies something physical.

was obtained from

Specifies the source from which something was extracted, providing more context.

was leached

Specifically refers to the removal of soluble constituents from a solid by percolation.

FAQs

How is "was extracted" used in a sentence?

The phrase "was extracted" is used to describe the action of something being removed or taken out of something else. For instance, "The confession "was extracted" after hours of interrogation."

What are some alternatives to "was extracted"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "was removed", "was obtained", or "was isolated".

Is it better to say "the information was extracted" or "the information was gathered"?

The better phrase depends on the context. "Was extracted" suggests a deliberate and sometimes difficult process of obtaining specific information. "Was gathered" implies a broader collection of information from various sources.

Can "was extracted" be used in both formal and informal writing?

While "was extracted" is generally suitable for formal writing, it might sound overly technical in informal contexts. In informal situations, consider using simpler phrases like "was taken out" or "was removed".