Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was explained with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was explained with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing how something was clarified or made understandable through a specific method or means. Example: "The complex theory was explained with a series of diagrams that illustrated the key concepts."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(14)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
43 human-written examples
The Edit concept was explained with gentle enthusiasm.
News & Media
Every arcane aspect of accounting, business practice and tax was explained with exquisite accuracy.
News & Media
The anti-bacterial mechanism of the composite coatings was explained with the extended DLVO theory.
Science
This was explained with reference to a previous study that related anthropometrics to differences in joint angles.
This heterogeneity was explained with environmental attitudes and leisure activities as well as knowledge and land ownership.
Science
The individual effect of the supercritical carbon dioxide, ethanol and solution streams was explained with a mass transfer model.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
17 human-written examples
The phenomenon can be explained with H-bonds.
Academia
Other brain concepts will be explained with graphics.
News & Media
The operation of a regenerative amplifier is explained with illustrations.
This may be explained with fragmentation processes or displacement.
Each design chart is explained with a brief example.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was explained with", ensure that the 'with' clause clearly identifies the tool, method, or concept used in the explanation to provide a clear and specific understanding for the reader.
Common error
Avoid using "was explained with" followed by an ambiguous or overly general phrase. Always specify what the explanation relied on for clarity, like "was explained with a detailed diagram" instead of "was explained with details".
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was explained with" functions as a passive construction indicating how something was clarified or made understandable. Ludwig shows its usage across various contexts, highlighting its role in conveying explanations through specific methods or tools. It connects a subject with the means used for its clarification.
Frequent in
Science
75%
News & Media
17%
Academia
8%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was explained with" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe how something was clarified, typically by detailing the specific method, tool, or concept used in the explanation. Ludwig AI affirms its proper usage and demonstrates its prevalence in scientific, academic, and news contexts. While versatile, it's crucial to ensure the 'with' clause is clear and specific. Related phrases like "was clarified by means of" or "was elucidated through" offer alternative ways to express the same idea. This phrase serves to enlighten and provide clarity, making it a valuable tool in both formal and informal communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was clarified by means of
Emphasizes the method or instrument used for clarification.
was elucidated through
Highlights the process of making something clear and understandable.
was interpreted using
Focuses on the perspective or framework applied to understand something.
was accounted for by
Suggests that something was explained in terms of a specific factor or reason.
was demonstrated via
Highlights the use of evidence or examples to support the explanation.
was justified by
Indicates that the explanation provides a rationale or defense for something.
was rationalized through
Suggests an attempt to make something seem reasonable or logical.
was illustrated with
Emphasizes the use of visual aids or examples to explain something.
was detailed using
Focuses on the thoroughness and precision of the explanation.
was attributed to
Suggests that the explanation identifies a cause or source.
FAQs
How can I use "was explained with" in a sentence?
Use "was explained with" to indicate the method, concept, or tool used to clarify something. For example, "The complex theory "was explained with" a series of diagrams".
What are some alternatives to "was explained with"?
You can use alternatives like "was clarified by means of", "was elucidated through", or "was interpreted using" depending on the specific context.
Is it correct to say "was explained by" instead of "was explained with"?
Yes, "was explained by" can be used, but it typically refers to the agent or cause of the explanation, while ""was explained with"" refers to the means or method used for the explanation.
What is the difference between "was explained with" and "was described with"?
"Was explained with" focuses on making something understandable using a specific method or tool, whereas "was described with" focuses on providing details or characteristics using specific terms or attributes. The first focuses on understanding, and the second on portraying.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested