Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was evident
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"was evident" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is easily seen or noticed. For example: "Her excitement was evident as she opened her birthday present."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
The strain was evident.
News & Media
The challenge was evident.
News & Media
That was evident Sunday.
News & Media
Her boredom was evident.
News & Media
Voter outrage was evident.
News & Media
No motive was evident.
News & Media
"It was evident today.
News & Media
The planning was evident.
News & Media
Their skill was evident.
News & Media
His sincerity was evident.
News & Media
His drive was evident.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "was evident" to clearly indicate that something was easily seen or understood from the available evidence. It's particularly effective when describing states, feelings, or consequences.
Common error
While "was evident" is suitable for many situations, avoid overuse in highly formal or academic writing where more precise language might be preferred. Consider alternatives like "demonstrated", "indicated", or "suggested" for a more sophisticated tone.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was evident" functions as a linking verb phrase connecting a subject to a predicate adjective or adjectival phrase. It asserts that a particular quality or state was easily noticeable or understood. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
64%
Science
28%
Formal & Business
4%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was evident" is a grammatically sound and versatile phrase indicating that something was easily seen or understood. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's widely used across various contexts, especially in news and media. While its neutral register makes it suitable for most situations, consider more precise language for highly formal or scientific writing. Alternatives like "was apparent" or "was clear" can offer subtle variations in meaning. Remember to avoid overuse and maintain clarity by ensuring the evidence supports what "was evident".
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was apparent
Emphasizes that something was easily noticeable or understood.
was clear
Highlights the lack of ambiguity or confusion surrounding something.
was obvious
Indicates that something was very easy to see or understand.
was noticeable
Focuses on something being easily observed or attracting attention.
was discernible
Suggests that something could be perceived, even if not immediately obvious.
was palpable
Implies that something was so intense it could almost be physically felt.
was manifest
Indicates that something was clearly revealed or displayed.
was unmistakable
Highlights that something could not be confused with anything else.
was plain
Stresses the simplicity and straightforwardness of something being evident.
was conspicuous
Emphasizes that something stood out and was easily noticed due to its unusual nature.
FAQs
How can I use "was evident" in a sentence?
Use "was evident" to indicate something easily seen or understood. For example: "Her joy "was evident" when she received the news."
What are some alternatives to "was evident"?
Alternatives include "was apparent", "was clear", or "was obvious", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to use "was evident" or "was obvious"?
Both are similar, but "was evident" suggests something is clear from the available evidence, while "was obvious" implies immediate and easy understanding without needing much evidence.
Can "was evident" be used in formal writing?
Yes, "was evident" is generally acceptable in formal writing, but consider more precise alternatives like "demonstrated" or "indicated" for a more sophisticated tone in academic or highly formal contexts.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested