was evidence enough

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'was evidence enough' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to convey the idea that something was sufficient proof of a fact or opinion. For example, "The overwhelming success of his previous album was evidence enough that his next album would be just as successful."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Tech

Opinion

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

He did not remind us that the woman's testimony was evidence enough.

The Guardian - Opinion

He had sent me explicit pictures and that was evidence enough of my guilt.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

The tit-for-tat response was evidence enough for the auto blogosphere to declare the start of a BMW-Audi "billboard war".

The New York Times

Blonde hair and blue eyes was evidence enough for police in Greece, and in two separate cases in Ireland, to take action.

The Guardian - Opinion

Whether or not Ms. Gevinson's fame outlasts her youth, the road trip's popularity was evidence enough that her message was resonating, at least for a self-selecting group.

The New York Times

This was evidence enough to get Ravens linebacker Ray Lewis to later float out the conspiracy theory that the NFL plotted the blackout in order to encourage a San Francisco comeback and thus ensure a closer game.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

Dead trout, drifting like buoys, were evidence enough.

The New York Times

The Fabiola installation is evidence enough of a basic human truth: art will be made.

The New York Times - Arts

That New Hampshire may move its primary into 2007 should be evidence enough.

The New York Times

For some that will be evidence enough of a government chucking money at favoured suppliers.

The Guardian - Tech

That list of titles is evidence enough for never going to the cinema again.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was evidence enough" to clearly indicate that the available information or observations sufficiently proved a point or justified a conclusion. This phrase works well in both formal and informal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "was evidence enough" when the evidence is weak or circumstantial. Ensure that the evidence genuinely supports the claim you're making; otherwise, consider using phrases like "suggested" or "hinted at" to reflect the uncertainty.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was evidence enough" functions as a predicate adjective phrase. It asserts that something met the standard for proof or justification. Ludwig AI validates this with examples demonstrating its use in various contexts to confirm the sufficiency of evidence.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Opinion

20%

Tech

6.66%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

6.66%

Science

3.33%

Formal & Business

3.33%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was evidence enough" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate that something served as sufficient proof. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage through numerous real-world examples from varied sources like news, opinion pieces, and tech articles. While the phrase is generally suitable for both formal and informal contexts, it's crucial to ensure that the evidence genuinely supports the claim to avoid overstating its strength. Alternatives like "constituted sufficient proof" or "provided ample justification" can be used to vary the language while maintaining the core meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

constituted sufficient proof

Emphasizes the aspect of formal proof or validation.

provided ample justification

Highlights the aspect of providing reasons or defense.

served as adequate grounds

Focuses on the idea of establishing a basis or foundation.

was proof positive

Stresses the undeniable nature of the evidence.

represented conclusive validation

Suggests a more definitive and final confirmation.

offered compelling substantiation

Highlights the convincing nature of the supporting evidence.

gave sufficient cause

Indicates that there was a good reason or motive.

furnished adequate confirmation

Focuses on reinforcing or verifying information.

established sufficient grounds

Highlights the establishment of a firm basis.

served as adequate demonstration

Highlights the aspect of showcasing or proving something effectively.

FAQs

How can I use "was evidence enough" in a sentence?

Use "was evidence enough" to indicate that a particular piece of information or a set of facts sufficiently proved a point. For example, "The suspect's confession "was evidence enough" to secure a conviction".

What are some alternatives to using "was evidence enough"?

Alternatives include "constituted sufficient proof", "provided ample justification", or "served as adequate grounds", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "was evidence enough" in formal writing?

Yes, "was evidence enough" is suitable for both formal and informal writing. It's a straightforward way to express that something served as sufficient proof or justification. The choice depends on your writing style and audience.

What's the difference between "was evidence enough" and "there wasn't enough evidence"?

"Was evidence enough" means that the available evidence sufficiently proved a point, while "there wasn't enough evidence" suggests that the evidence was insufficient to draw a definitive conclusion. The former confirms something, while the latter expresses doubt or lack of proof.