was evaluated to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was evaluated to" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used in contexts where an assessment or judgment is made, but the correct form would be "was evaluated as" or "was evaluated to be." Example: "The project was evaluated to be successful based on the criteria set by the committee."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

pHpzc was evaluated to be 6.29.

Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

NACT was evaluated to establish selection criteria.

European Journal of Cancer

The measurement uncertainty was evaluated to be ±5%.

EJNMMI Research

The upper limit was evaluated to be 8000 g/mol.

Polymer

Bacterial degradation by P. aureginosae was evaluated to demonstrate the biodegradability of the catalyst system.

Nano-Micro Letters

The patient record was evaluated to determine reasons for noncompliance as shown in Table 1.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Electrospray ionization (ESI) was evaluated to obtain a better response from the analytes.

Chemistry Central Journal

Results: A series of well-described PET tracers was evaluated to set the LSE threshold.

EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry

In other words, the thinned forest environment was evaluated to be relatively dark and wet.

Progress in Earth and Planetary Science

The performance of the three procedures was evaluated to determine the most efficient application.

Applied Water Science

Cell viability was evaluated to exclude any toxic effect of SPIO or Cell Sense.

European Radiology Experimental

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing an evaluation, use the correct grammatical structure: "was evaluated as" or "was evaluated to be".

Common error

Avoid using "to" after "evaluated" when you mean "evaluated as" or "evaluated to be". Always double-check your preposition choice to maintain grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was evaluated to" functions as a passive construction indicating that something underwent an assessment or judgment. However, it is grammatically questionable. Ludwig AI points out that the correct form should be "was evaluated as" or "was evaluated to be".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was evaluated to" is frequently used, especially in scientific literature, to denote that something has been assessed. However, Ludwig AI signals that it is grammatically incorrect; the proper forms are "was evaluated as" or "was evaluated to be". While prevalent, it's advisable to opt for grammatically sound alternatives like "was evaluated as", "was assessed to be", or "was determined to be" to maintain accuracy and clarity in writing. Always prioritize grammatical correctness, even if a phrase is commonly used.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was evaluated as

Corrects the grammatical structure to the standard form using "as" instead of "to."

was assessed to be

Replaces "evaluated" with "assessed" and corrects the grammatical structure to the standard form using "to be."

was determined to be

Emphasizes the determination aspect of the evaluation.

was judged to be

Highlights the judgment aspect of the evaluation.

was found to be

Indicates a discovery through evaluation.

was considered to be

Expresses a considered opinion or assessment.

was deemed to be

Implies a formal judgment or decision.

was measured to be

Focuses on a quantitative evaluation.

was appraised as

Replaces "evaluated" with "appraised" and corrects the grammatical structure to the standard form using "as."

was estimated to be

Implies an approximate evaluation.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "was evaluated" in a sentence?

The correct usage is "was evaluated as" or "was evaluated to be". For example, "The project "was evaluated as successful"" or "The project "was evaluated to be successful"".

What are some alternatives to "was evaluated to"?

You can use alternatives like "was assessed to be", "was determined to be", or "was judged to be".

Is it grammatically correct to say "was evaluated to"?

No, it's not grammatically correct. The correct forms are "was evaluated as" or "was evaluated to be". While common, "was evaluated to" should be avoided in formal writing.

What's the difference between "was evaluated as" and "was evaluated to be"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning. "Was evaluated as" directly states the evaluation result, while "was evaluated to be" emphasizes the process of reaching that conclusion.