Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was evaluated as

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was evaluated as" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the assessment or judgment of something, often in formal or academic contexts. Example: "The project was evaluated as successful based on the criteria set by the committee."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The experience of the doctor was evaluated as well.

The influence of metal concentration was evaluated as well.

Seizure intensity was evaluated as described elsewhere [63], [64].

Science

Plosone

Eyelid closure was evaluated as above.

Anchorage independence growth was evaluated as originally described [ 37].

Science

BMC Cancer

The condition was evaluated as class V.

Pain was evaluated as a secondary outcome.

Noise was evaluated as previously described for liver parenchyma.

Chlorophyll content was evaluated as reported (Lin et al. 2013).

However, the Cormack grade was evaluated as III.

Hs-CRP was evaluated as a continuous variable (Table 1).

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer active voice constructions such as 'the committee evaluated the project as...' when the actor is known, for direct and concise phrasing.

Common error

Avoid using "was evaluated as" excessively in situations where the actor can be clearly identified. Over-reliance on passive voice can make writing sound vague and less engaging.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

80%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was evaluated as" functions as a passive construction indicating that something has undergone a process of assessment. Ludwig provides examples of its use in scientific contexts, confirming its role in describing research outcomes and findings.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was evaluated as" is a grammatically correct and commonly used passive construction, primarily found in formal and scientific writing. Ludwig AI confirms its suitability for expressing the results of assessments and judgments. While versatile, consider employing active voice for more direct communication. The phrase is most frequently encountered within scientific literature. The phrase can be replaced by alternatives such as "was assessed to be" or "was judged as" depending on the specific nuances needed.

FAQs

How can I use "was evaluated as" in a sentence?

You can use "was evaluated as" to describe the outcome of an assessment or judgment. For example, "The program "was evaluated as" successful based on its positive impact on student performance."

What are some alternatives to "was evaluated as"?

Alternatives include "was assessed to be", "was judged as", or "was deemed to be", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was evaluated as"?

While "was evaluated as" is grammatically correct, using the active voice (e.g., "The committee evaluated the proposal") can often make your writing more direct and concise.

What is the difference between "was evaluated as" and "was considered as"?

"Was evaluated as" implies a more formal or structured assessment, while "was considered as" suggests a more general or informal consideration. Evaluation typically involves specific criteria and methods.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

80%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: