Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was estimated for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was estimated for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a value or amount that has been approximated for a specific purpose or context. Example: "The total cost of the project was estimated for completion by the end of the year."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Each disease׳s prevalence was estimated for the town׳s residents.

Ks was estimated for a shallow subsurface ash-gray layer.

Science

Geoderma

Internal consistency was estimated for males and females separately (Cronbach's α males and females: 0.92).

Science & Research

Nature

(a) The efficiency of knockdown was estimated for each individual gene.

Science & Research

Nature

RT was estimated for each session by including both correct and incorrect trials for each SC.

Science & Research

Nature

The greatest cost growth (1.5 1.8) was estimated for PBR systems, while the lowest cost growth (1.2 1.4) was estimated for the ORP systems and coupled systems.

High heritability coupled with high-to-moderate genetic advance was estimated for all characters studied.

The process energy consumption was estimated for gas separation processes by the formation of clathrate hydrates.

Science

Energy

A Frel value of 0.89 was estimated for transdermal vs. oral buspirone.

Biomechanical loading on spine and shoulder was estimated for one of the workstations.

The Hertz maximum contact pressure was estimated for axial and radial contacts as 0.036 MPa.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was estimated for", ensure that the method of estimation is clear, especially in scientific writing. This adds credibility to your approximation.

Common error

Avoid using "was estimated for" without specifying how the estimation was performed. Without context, the estimate lacks authority and may be misinterpreted.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was estimated for" functions as a passive construction used to indicate that a value, quantity, or parameter has been approximated or assessed for a specific purpose, entity, or condition. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

92%

Academia

5%

News & Media

1%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was estimated for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, predominantly in formal and scientific contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it accurately conveys that an approximation or assessment has been made for a specific purpose. While alternatives like "was approximated for" or "was assessed for" exist, the key is to ensure clarity in the method of estimation to maintain credibility. Predominantly found in science and academic sources, this phrase serves to objectively report on evaluations and approximations, making it a valuable tool in technical and analytical writing.

FAQs

How to use "was estimated for" in a sentence?

The phrase "was estimated for" is used to indicate that a value or quantity has been approximated. For example, "The cost of the project "was estimated for" completion by the end of the year".

What can I say instead of "was estimated for"?

You can use alternatives like "was approximated for", "was assessed for", or "was calculated for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was estimated for" or "was estimated at"?

Both phrases are correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "Was estimated for" is used to indicate the purpose or recipient of the estimation, while "was estimated at" specifies the estimated value.

What's the difference between "was estimated for" and "was predicted for"?

"Was estimated for" generally refers to an approximation based on available data, while "was predicted for" suggests a forecast or projection into the future.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: