was erroneously recorded in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was erroneously recorded in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something was mistakenly documented or noted in a particular context or location. Example: "The patient's medication dosage was erroneously recorded in the medical chart, leading to a serious oversight."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

A sale of equipment was erroneously recorded in July 2003 before the deal was completed, JLG said, adding that it would delay its second-quarter earnings announcement until an internal review was completed.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

A third challenge is related to the quality of coding of diagnoses; it is known that E-coding of injury records may have been incomplete [ 17] and codes may be erroneously recorded in the register [ 7].

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

In two cases, only env could be sequenced from both original samples: the analyses indicated no evidence for superinfection; this data, however, did not allow us to determine which of the original pol sequences was erroneously recorded for the patient.

BMC Infectious Diseases

This is not a tax credit, as was erroneously reported in some of our leading journals.

Forbes

It was erroneously reported in Friday's Calendar that it had never been released on video.

Los Angeles Times

Mr. Sorin also clarified some aspects that had been erroneously reported in various news accounts.

The New York Times

Owee, he said, was erroneously entered in the birth registry instead of Oved.

The New York Times

In an earlier version, Reporters Without Borders was erroneously included in a list of the signatories to the statement.

The Guardian - Books

This strain was erroneously called KL16-211" in the paper cited.

Yale University

A 5-year-old child was erroneously given glipizide in repeated doses over 3 days [ 47].

Critical Care

One patient was excluded from this pathology calculation because the time of lab results in the electronic medical record was erroneously delayed by a significant amount.

BioMed Research International

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was erroneously recorded in", ensure the context clearly identifies what was recorded, where it was recorded, and the nature of the error. This helps to avoid ambiguity and ensures the reader understands the mistake.

Common error

Avoid using "was erroneously recorded in" without specifying the location or system where the error occurred. For example, instead of saying "The data was erroneously recorded in", specify "The data was erroneously recorded in the patient's file".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was erroneously recorded in" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that an action (recording) was performed on a subject incorrectly. Ludwig confirms its correct and usable status in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was erroneously recorded in" is a grammatically correct and usable passive voice construction, as confirmed by Ludwig, primarily used to report errors in documentation or record-keeping. While not exceedingly common, it finds use in formal contexts such as news, science, and academia. To ensure clarity, always specify the location or system where the error occurred. Alternatives like "was incorrectly documented in" or "was mistakenly registered in" offer similar meanings with slightly different nuances. Remember that while both "erroneously" and "incorrectly" are usable, "erroneously" typically lends a more formal tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was incorrectly documented in

Replaces "erroneously recorded" with "incorrectly documented", focusing on the act of documentation being flawed.

was mistakenly registered in

Substitutes "erroneously recorded" with "mistakenly registered", emphasizing the registration process being incorrect.

was inaccurately entered in

Changes "erroneously recorded" to "inaccurately entered", highlighting the inaccuracy of the data entry.

was wrongly noted in

Replaces "erroneously recorded" with "wrongly noted", indicating that the information was incorrectly observed or written down.

was falsely registered in

Uses "falsely registered" instead of "erroneously recorded", suggesting that the record contains false information.

was improperly logged in

Changes "erroneously recorded" to "improperly logged", focusing on the logging process being flawed.

was erroneously documented within

Similar in meaning, but specifies that the error is in a document.

was incorrectly registered on

Similar in meaning, but specifies that the error is on something specific.

was mistakenly transcribed in

Substitutes "erroneously recorded" with "mistakenly transcribed", emphasizing the transcription process being incorrect.

was falsely inputted in

Uses "falsely inputted" instead of "erroneously recorded", suggesting that the data inputted is false.

FAQs

How can I use "was erroneously recorded in" in a sentence?

You can use "was erroneously recorded in" to indicate that something was mistakenly documented or noted in a particular context. For example: "The patient's medication dosage "was erroneously recorded in" the medical chart, leading to a serious oversight."

What are some alternatives to "was erroneously recorded in"?

Some alternatives include "was incorrectly documented in", "was mistakenly registered in", or "was inaccurately entered in", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use "erroneously" or "incorrectly" with "recorded in"?

"Erroneously" and "incorrectly" are often interchangeable, but "erroneously" suggests a more formal tone. Choose the word that best fits the overall style and register of your writing. For example, in a technical report, "erroneously" might be more appropriate, while in a casual email, "incorrectly" may suffice.

Which is correct: "was erroneously recorded in" or "was erroneously recorded on"?

Both "was erroneously recorded in" and "was erroneously recorded on" can be correct, depending on the context. Use "in" when referring to a document, file, or system. Use "on" when referring to a specific item or surface.