was erected

USAGE SUMMARY

"was erected" is a correct and usable form of written English.
You can use it to describe a process of something being built or put in place. For example: "A new sign was erected in front of City Hall."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A new marker was erected.

The New York Times

Neither was erected.

The New York Times - Books

It was erected in 1916.

The New York Times

/ This stone was erected by the N.C.O.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The church building was erected in 1821.

Cornell University

Agnus's copy was erected in 1907.

The Washington Post

Barbed wire was erected in Hungary.

The Guardian - Opinion

A house of worship was erected in 1838.

Cornell University

Later, a modest stone was erected by friends.

Encyclopedia Britannica

First a structure of plaster-covered wood was erected.

The New Yorker

The Assay Office building was erected in 1930.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using synonyms like "was built" or "was constructed" for a more general sense of creation, or "was installed" when referring to the fitting of equipment.

Common error

Avoid using "was erected" for abstract concepts or situations where physical construction isn't involved. For instance, it's incorrect to say "a theory was erected"; instead, use "was developed" or "was formulated".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was erected" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something has been built or set up by an unspecified agent. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is a correct and usable form of written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Academia

25%

Wiki

18%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

15%

Science

7%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was erected" functions as a passive construction to describe the building or setting up of something. Ludwig AI confirms that it is grammatically correct and suitable for various contexts. While commonly found in news articles, academic papers, and encyclopedias, it generally maintains a neutral to formal tone. When using "was erected", ensure it refers to a physical structure or deliberate construction and consider alternatives like "was built" or "was constructed" for broader applications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was constructed

Focuses on the process of building or assembling something, similar to "was erected" but with a broader application.

was built

A more general term for construction, implying creation or formation, similar to "was erected".

was set up

Suggests establishing or putting something in place, often temporary or less formal than "was erected".

was installed

Implies fitting something into a specific location or system, a more technical sense than "was erected".

was established

Focuses on founding or creating something, often an institution or organization, distinct from physical construction.

was raised

Emphasizes the act of lifting or elevating something, often used for structures or monuments.

was put in place

A more descriptive phrase emphasizing the action of positioning something.

was created

A broad term indicating the making or production of something, which can include construction.

was fashioned

Suggests shaping or forming something, often with a sense of craftsmanship or artistry.

was inaugurated

Focuses on the formal beginning or opening of something, such as a building or institution.

FAQs

How can I use "was erected" in a sentence?

The phrase "was erected" is used to describe something that has been built or put in place. For example, "A new monument "was erected" in the town square" or "The building "was erected" in 1930".

What are some alternatives to "was erected"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "was built", "was constructed", or "was established". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "has been erected" instead of "was erected"?

Yes, "has been erected" is also correct, but it implies a completed action with present relevance, while "was erected" simply describes a past event. For example, "The statue has been erected to honor the fallen soldiers" suggests it's still standing, while "The statue "was erected" in 1920" just states when it happened.

What is the difference between "was erected" and "was installed"?

"Was erected" typically refers to the construction of a structure, while "was installed" refers to the fitting or setting up of equipment or systems. For example, a building "was erected", but a security system "was installed".