Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was drawn

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was drawn" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was created or depicted, often in the context of art or illustrations. Example: "The beautiful landscape was drawn by a talented artist who captured every detail."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Blood was drawn.

News & Media

Independent

A plan was drawn up.

He was drawn to battle.

News & Media

The New York Times

The infield was drawn in.

He was drawn to science.

News & Media

The New Yorker

"I was drawn to that.

News & Media

The New York Times

That was drawn in 1979.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The winner was drawn.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The blood was drawn.

"Dream" was drawn out.

News & Media

The New Yorker

And yet I was drawn in.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was drawn" to describe a process of creating an image, plan, or conclusion. It's suitable for both formal and informal writing, adding a sense of completion or finality to the action.

Common error

Avoid using "was drawn" when an active voice construction would be more direct and clear. For instance, instead of "a conclusion was drawn by the committee", consider "the committee drew a conclusion".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was drawn" functions primarily as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received the action of drawing. Ludwig AI provides examples where it signifies depiction, attraction, or conclusion, showcasing its versatile application.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

47%

Science

26%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was drawn" is a versatile passive construction, commonly used to describe a completed action where the subject receives the action of drawing. According to Ludwig AI, it can indicate depiction, attraction, or conclusion, and it's suitable for both formal and informal writing. The phrase is frequently found in News & Media, Science, and Wiki sources. Remember to use it when you want to emphasize the result or object of the action rather than the actor, and avoid overuse in situations where an active voice would be more direct.

FAQs

How can I use "was drawn" in a sentence?

The phrase "was drawn" is used to indicate that something has been depicted, attracted, or concluded. For example, "The map "was drawn" with great precision", "He "was drawn" to the music", or "A conclusion "was drawn" from the evidence".

What are some alternatives to "was drawn"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases such as "was depicted", "was attracted to", or "was inferred".

Is it correct to say "was draw" instead of "was drawn"?

No, "was draw" is grammatically incorrect. The past participle of "draw" is "drawn", so the correct phrase is "was drawn".

What is the difference between "was drawn" and "is drawn"?

"Was drawn" refers to a past action, while "is drawn" refers to a present or ongoing action. For example, "The portrait "was drawn" last year" (past), and "The boundary line "is drawn" according to the treaty" (present).

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: