Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was developed using
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was developed using" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the method or tools employed in the creation of something, such as software, technology, or a product. Example: "The application was developed using advanced machine learning algorithms to enhance user experience."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The photoresist was developed using an AZ-300 MIF developer.
Science
The film was developed using a Konica SRX-101A developer.
Science
The linkage map was developed using JoinMap v. 2.021.
Science & Research
The signal was developed using enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (GE Healthcare).
Science & Research
The second generation was developed using Java.
The design was developed using Kansei Engineering.
Spaceship! was developed using social media tools: open-source software, a wiki, the blog.
News & Media
The CART model31 was developed using SPSS modeler 14.1 software (IBM Corp. USA).
Science & Research
The map was developed using ESRI ArcGIS 10 software (www.esri.com/arcgis).
Science & Research
Membrane was developed using an Enhanced Chemioluminiscent HRP substrate (Fisher Scientific).
Science & Research
TES model was developed using R software.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing the development process, be specific about the tools, techniques, or methodologies used. For example, instead of saying "The software was developed using modern technologies", specify which technologies were used, such as "The software was developed using Python and TensorFlow".
Common error
While "was developed using" is grammatically correct, overuse can lead to passive writing. To improve clarity and engagement, consider using active voice when appropriate. For example, instead of "The algorithm was developed using machine learning", try "Researchers developed the algorithm using machine learning".
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was developed using" functions as a passive construction, indicating the means or tools employed in the creation or improvement of something. Ludwig confirms its correct usage. Examples include "The application was developed using advanced machine learning algorithms" showing the mechanism of development.
Frequent in
Science
50%
News & Media
20%
Academia
15%
Less common in
Formal & Business
5%
Wiki
5%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was developed using" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to describe the methods and tools employed in the creation or improvement of something. As confirmed by Ludwig, its usage is widespread across various fields, including science, technology, and academia. While versatile, writers should be mindful of overusing passive voice and consider active voice for clarity. Alternatives like "was created with" can add variety. The phrase's frequency and adaptability make it a valuable tool in descriptive writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was created with
Focuses on the act of creation using specific tools or materials.
was built upon
Emphasizes the foundational aspect and the elements it relies on.
was constructed utilizing
Highlights the structured assembly and use of resources.
was fashioned from
Suggests a more artistic or handcrafted approach to development.
was implemented with
Focuses on the practical application and execution using specific methods.
was realized through
Emphasizes the process and means by which something was brought into existence.
was produced via
Indicates the method or channel through which something was made.
was generated employing
Highlights the use of particular techniques or technologies in its creation.
was derived from
Suggests that it originated or evolved from something else.
was composed of
Emphasizes the elements or components that make up the final product.
FAQs
What does "was developed using" mean?
The phrase "was developed using" indicates that a specific method, tool, or technology was employed in the creation, construction, or evolution of something. It highlights the means by which something was brought into existence or improved.
How can I use "was developed using" in a sentence?
You can use "was developed using" to describe how a product, software, strategy, or any other item was created or improved. For instance, "The app "was developed using" React Native" or "The marketing strategy "was developed using" data analytics."
What are some alternatives to "was developed using"?
Some alternatives include phrases like "was created with", "was built upon", "was constructed utilizing", or "was fashioned from". The choice depends on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was developed using"?
While "was developed using" is in passive voice, it is often appropriate when the focus is on the method or tool rather than the developer. However, using active voice can sometimes make the sentence more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "The software "was developed using" Java", you could say "The developers used Java to develop the software."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested