Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was detected between
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was detected between" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are indicating a range or interval during which something was observed or identified. Example: "The anomaly was detected between the hours of 2 PM and 4 PM."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Relatedness was detected between pair-wise accessions within the population.
Science
Significant genetic differentiation was detected between all populations.
Science
No significant difference was detected between the two substrates.
Science
No difference was detected between the left and right sides.
Significant correlation was detected between KWL engagement and teacher feedback.
A negative correlation was detected between the relative concentrations of PAHs and HMs.
Science
No other significant correlation was detected between force and biopsy data.
However, no correlation was detected between this good performance on the RMSE and the testing accuracy.
Science
No statistical difference was detected between NTCKD, HTCKD and iHT groups.
No difference was detected between treatments in terms of conception rates and services per conception.
One common QTL (qB12Ctbn2-2, qR14Dtbn2-2, qRJtbn2-2) was detected between the two related populations.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was detected between", ensure that the context clearly defines the two points or entities that the detection is occurring between. This clarifies the relationship or range being discussed.
Common error
Avoid using "was detected between" when not comparing distinct, related entities or points. For example, it's incorrect to say "A correlation was detected between happiness and Tuesday" because happiness and Tuesday aren't directly comparable in a way that reflects a meaningful relationship.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was detected between" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a relationship, difference, or correlation was found through some process. As Ludwig AI's examples show, it's commonly used to describe findings in scientific or research contexts.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was detected between" is a grammatically sound phrase commonly used in scientific and formal writing to report the discovery of a relationship, difference, or correlation between two entities. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's prevalent in scientific contexts, emphasizing objectivity and factual reporting. When using this phrase, ensure a clear and logical connection between the compared elements to avoid misuse. While correct, "was detected between" may sound overly formal in casual conversation, where simpler alternatives might be preferred.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was identified within
Indicates a specific location or boundary where something was found, shifting the focus to location.
was observed across
Focuses on observation over a range, implying a continuous detection rather than a specific bounded interval.
was measured during
Highlights the timing of the measurement, emphasizing the process of measurement during a period.
was found in
Indicates the presence of something within a specific environment or context, simpler and less formal.
a connection was observed
Indicates a link or relationship was seen, focusing on the connection more than the range.
was correlated with
Suggests a statistical relationship rather than a detection within a range, focusing on correlation.
a difference was noted
Emphasizes the existence of a dissimilarity, but does not provide the specific relationship of "between".
a distinction was found
Emphasizes the presence of a difference rather than a detection within a range.
a contrast was noted between
Highlights difference between distinct items; places focus on a noticed contrast.
evidence emerged linking
Shifts the focus to the emergence of evidence rather than the detection within a range, implying a new finding.
FAQs
How is "was detected between" used in scientific writing?
In scientific writing, "was detected between" is often used to describe relationships, differences, or correlations observed between two groups, conditions, or variables. For instance, "A significant difference "was detected between" the control group and the treatment group" indicates a notable finding in an experiment.
What are some alternatives to "was detected between"?
Alternatives include "was observed across", "was identified within", or "a difference was noted", depending on the specific context. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize observation, identification, or difference.
Is it correct to use "was detected between" in everyday conversation?
While grammatically correct, "was detected between" is more common in formal or scientific writing. In everyday conversation, it might sound overly formal. Simpler alternatives like "was found in" or "a connection was observed" may be more appropriate.
What kind of nouns should I use with "was detected between"?
The phrase works best with nouns representing quantifiable or measurable entities, such as "correlation", "difference", or "relationship". It should link two distinct but related items being compared.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested