Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was detected after
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was detected after" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was identified or discovered following a specific event or action. Example: "The anomaly was detected after the system underwent a routine check."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
No carbon deposition was detected after 72 hours.
Science
Finally, immunological signal was detected after the membrane was equilibrated in detection buffer.
Science
FOSL1 binding was detected after CD4+ T cell stimulation.
Science & Research
The strain was detected after a magnetic resonance imaging scan yesterday.
News & Media
In addition, the release of cytokines was detected after using Ly6C and Ly6G antibodies, respectively.
Science & Research
Gathers's heart rhythm disorder was detected after he collapsed in a game on Dec. 9, 1989.
News & Media
No adverse cytotoxicity for human gingival fibroblast cell lines (HGF) was detected after 4 days.
A significant elevation of p-Akt was detected after rosiglitazone treatment.
Science
H2 concentration in arterial blood, venous blood and brain tissue was detected after H2 inhalation separately.
Science
No pathogen or bacterial growth was detected after HTST pasteurization with the new instrument.
As few as 1 CFU/ml was detected after 6 h of enrichment.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was detected after", ensure that the sequence of events is clear. Specify what was detected and the event or time frame following which the detection occurred to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid assuming that the event mentioned immediately after "was detected after" is necessarily the cause. Clearly establish the causal link if it exists, or rephrase to indicate correlation rather than causation.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was detected after" functions as a passive construction indicating the discovery or identification of something subsequent to a particular event or time. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, highlighting its wide applicability in different contexts.
Frequent in
Science
68%
News & Media
18%
Academia
13%
Less common in
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was detected after" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate that something was discovered or identified subsequent to a particular event. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its usage spans across diverse fields, including science, news, and academia. While it establishes a temporal relationship, it does not automatically imply causation. Therefore, clarity in writing is essential to convey the intended meaning accurately. The phrase exhibits a neutral to formal register and enjoys widespread acceptance, making it a reliable choice for expressing temporal sequences in various contexts.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was identified following
Replaces "detected" with "identified" and "after" with "following", offering a more formal tone.
was discovered subsequent to
Substitutes "detected" with "discovered" and "after" with the more formal "subsequent to".
was observed subsequent to
Similar to 'was discovered subsequent to', but uses 'observed', common in scientific contexts.
was found in the wake of
Uses "found" instead of "detected" and "in the wake of" to indicate a consequence or result.
was revealed following
Suggests the detection uncovered something that was previously concealed or unknown.
became apparent following
Employs "became apparent" to suggest the detection involved a gradual realization.
came to light after
Replaces "was detected" with "came to light", implying something previously hidden was revealed.
was noticed after
Uses "noticed" instead of "detected", suitable when the discovery is less formal or scientific.
emerged after
Implies the detection involved something coming into existence or becoming known after a certain point.
turned up after
An informal alternative, where "turned up" replaces "was detected", suitable for less formal contexts.
FAQs
How can I use "was detected after" in a sentence?
Use "was detected after" to indicate that something was discovered or identified following a specific event. For example, "The error "was detected after" the system update."
What are some alternatives to "was detected after"?
You can use alternatives such as "was identified following", "was discovered subsequent to", or "came to light after" depending on the context.
Is it better to use "was detected after" or "was detected before"?
The choice between "was detected after" and "was detected before" depends on the chronological order you want to emphasize. "Was detected after" highlights what followed the detection, while "was detected before" emphasizes what preceded it.
Can "was detected after" imply causation?
While "was detected after" indicates a temporal sequence, it doesn't automatically imply causation. If a causal relationship exists, it should be explicitly stated. Otherwise, it simply means the detection happened at some point following another event.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested