was defined with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was defined with" is a valid and commonly used phrase in written English.
You can use this phrase to indicate that something has been described or determined with a certain set of characteristics. For example, "The new policy was defined with a focus on safety and efficiency."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Statistical significance was defined with p < 0.05.

Nature

Another set of characteristics was defined with respect to hubs.

Nature

In experiment, standard position was defined with golden device.

Microelectronics Reliability

The overall scope of our project was defined with the timeline constraint in mind.

Cornell University

Cell position was defined with respect to longitudinal coordinates of each slice.

Nature

For 19 K562 half-cell data, the differential gene expression was defined with FDR < 0.1.

Nature

For ~400 K562 single cells, the differential gene expression was defined with FDR < 0.05.

Nature

The criterion was defined with initial bottom helical angle and obtained by bottom deformation analyses.

Acta Astronautica

An experimental design was defined with two factors (micro-gel shape and concentration).

Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects

The 3D pore size in the scaffold was defined with trabecular separation parameter corresponding to fiber separation in woven material which is equal to mean pore size.

Nature

Bleeding was defined with ELSO criteria (ELSO anticoagulation guidelines).

Annals of Intensive Care

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was defined with", ensure the criteria or parameters that constitute the definition are clearly stated. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was defined with" without specifying what it was defined with. For example, instead of saying "The experiment was defined with care", specify "The experiment was defined with strict controls and precise measurements."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was defined with" functions as a passive construction used to indicate the parameters, criteria, or methods that specify a particular definition. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, showcasing its common use in establishing clear parameters, especially in scientific and technical contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

95%

Academia

3%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was defined with" is a commonly used and grammatically sound way to indicate the parameters or criteria used in establishing a definition. As validated by Ludwig AI, it's frequently found in scientific and academic writing, emphasizing precision and clarity. While alternatives like "was characterized by" or "was specified by" exist, the key is to ensure clarity in what the subject was defined with. By avoiding vague language and specifying the defining elements, you can effectively use "was defined with" to ensure your writing is both accurate and easily understood. Its usage reflects formal and scientific registers, underscoring its importance in technical and academic discourse.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was characterized by

This alternative shifts the focus to the characteristics that define something, emphasizing its qualities.

was specified by

This alternative emphasizes the precise and detailed nature of the definition.

was determined by

This alternative highlights the process of establishing a definition based on certain factors.

was identified by

This alternative focuses on the recognition of something based on its definition.

was described through

This alternative emphasizes the method or means used to define something.

was expressed in terms of

This alternative highlights the specific language or concepts used in the definition.

was grounded in

This alternative highlights that the definition is based on something fundamental or foundational.

was established using

This alternative emphasizes the tools, methods, or standards used in creating the definition.

was structured around

This alternative emphasizes that the construction of a definition is build on an underlying base or concept.

was formulated with

This alternative shifts the focus to the careful formation and articulation of a definition.

FAQs

How can I use "was defined with" in a sentence?

Use "was defined with" to explain the criteria or characteristics used to establish a definition. For example, "Statistical significance was defined with p < 0.05."

What are some alternatives to "was defined with"?

Alternatives include "was characterized by", "was specified by", or "was determined by", depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when using "defined with"?

Using the passive voice with "was defined with" is common, but you can also use the active voice. For instance, instead of "The term was defined with specific parameters", you could say "We defined the term with specific parameters".

What's the difference between "defined with" and "defined by"?

"Defined with" emphasizes the elements included in the definition, whereas "defined by" emphasizes the factors that determine the definition. "The project scope was defined with a timeline constraint" focuses on inclusion of the timeline, while "The project scope was defined by the available resources" focuses on determination through resource limitations.