was deemed

USAGE SUMMARY

'was deemed' is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it to refer to when someone or something has been judged or thought of in a certain way. Example: The new policy was deemed to be overly restrictive and was eventually overturned.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Lloyd was deemed missing.

The New York Times

The complex was deemed revolutionary.

The New York Times

It was deemed a success.

Independent

A crackdown was deemed appropriate.

The New York Times - Arts

Later, that was deemed unnecessary.

The New York Times - Sports

That was deemed unseemly.

The Guardian

After treatment, she was deemed cancer-free.

The New York Times

The game was deemed a sellout.

The New York Times - Sports

The styling was deemed "puffy and overdone".

The New York Times

She was deemed to be emotionally "withholding".

The New York Times - Magazine

He was deemed to be fine.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was deemed", ensure that the source or basis of the judgment is clear, either explicitly stated or easily inferred from the context. This adds credibility and clarity to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "was deemed" in overly casual or informal settings. Simpler alternatives like "was considered" or "was thought to be" might be more appropriate to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was deemed" functions as a passive construction, indicating that someone or something has been judged or considered in a particular way. Ludwig AI confirms this usage is correct and frequently found across diverse sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Science

24%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Unknown

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was deemed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction that conveys a sense of formal judgment or assessment. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is most commonly found in news and media, as well as scientific contexts. While versatile, it is important to consider the context and choose it when a formal or objective tone is desired, avoiding overuse in casual conversation. Alternatives like "was considered" or "was judged" may be more appropriate in less formal settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was considered

Indicates a more general level of contemplation or evaluation, lacking the formal pronouncement implied by 'deemed'.

was judged

Focuses more on the act of making a judgment or decision, often implying a formal or legal context.

was regarded as

Implies a widespread or generally held opinion about something or someone.

was viewed as

Similar to 'regarded as', but may suggest a more subjective or personal perspective.

was found to be

Suggests a discovery or conclusion reached after investigation or analysis.

was assessed as

Emphasizes a formal evaluation or appraisal of something or someone.

was determined to be

Implies a definite conclusion reached after careful consideration or investigation.

was reputed to be

Indicates that something is known or believed by many people, but may not be definitively proven.

was accounted as

Indicates to consider in a specific way.

was believed to be

Focuses on a belief or assumption about something, rather than a definitive judgment.

FAQs

How can I use "was deemed" in a sentence?

You can use "was deemed" to indicate that something has been officially judged or considered in a particular way. For instance, "The project "was deemed a success" after the initial results came in".

What are some alternatives to "was deemed"?

Alternatives to "was deemed" include phrases like "was considered", "was judged", or "was regarded as", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more appropriate to use "was deemed" or "was considered"?

"Was deemed" implies a more formal assessment or official judgment, while "was considered" suggests a more general level of contemplation or evaluation. The choice depends on the context and the degree of formality you want to convey.

What's the difference between "was deemed" and "was found to be"?

"Was deemed" implies a judgment or opinion, while "was found to be" suggests a discovery or conclusion based on evidence or investigation. The former is more about assessment, the latter about factual finding.