was counted from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was counted from" is correct and usable in written English.
For example, "The number of visitors was counted from the start of the year."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The number of splits in each veneer was counted from the Novascan grader (Grenzebach, Germany) images.

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

Number of spikes per plant was counted from ten sample points of 0.5 m length each.

International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

The swelling time was counted from when the deionized water was added into the vial.

Chemistry Central Journal

The number of tillers per plant was counted from samples of ten plants per plot.

International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

The total of sterile and fertile spikelet was counted from the bagged panicles of all the plants in each testcross.

Rice

The number of cells with at least one labelled BFA compartment was counted from images acquired by confocal microscopy, from time 0 to the indicated times.

Rice

The number of yellow bristles was counted from each image.

Plosone

Gestational age was counted from the day, when a vaginal plug was detected.

Plosone

The proportion of these flowers producing fruits was counted (from here on described as 'fruit-set').

Plosone

The number of cells per well was counted from duplicate wells by trypsinizing the cells.

Plosone

The percentage of surface area occupied by acinar cells was counted from two different sections (upper-middle) of each gland.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In scientific writing, "was counted from" is appropriate when describing a quantitative assessment. Use it to indicate the basis for a numerical value or measurement.

Common error

Avoid using "was counted from" when the context implies estimation rather than an exact count. For instance, instead of saying 'The crowd size was counted from the aerial photos', consider 'The crowd size was estimated based on the aerial photos' if the count wasn't precise.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was counted from" functions as a passive construction specifying the source or origin from which a count or numerical value is derived. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, with many examples showing its application in research and analytical contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was counted from" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase, particularly in scientific literature, to indicate the origin of a numerical count or assessment. Ludwig AI validates its correctness. It's essential to explicitly state the source following the phrase for clarity and to avoid ambiguity. While highly prevalent in scientific contexts, it can be used in other areas where precise counts are derived from specific sources. Alternatives like "was calculated based on" or "was determined by" may be suitable depending on the specific emphasis required. The phrase is best suited for formal and objective writing, maintaining transparency and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was calculated based on

This alternative focuses on the calculation aspect, emphasizing the data used as a foundation.

was determined by

This option highlights the process of determining something based on specific criteria or data.

was derived from

This highlights the process of obtaining or developing something from a source.

was measured starting with

This variation emphasizes the action of measuring and the initial point of measurement.

was reckoned from

This alternative is more formal and indicates the calculation or estimation from a specific point.

originated from

This alternative indicates the origin or source of something, rather than a numerical count.

commenced from

This alternative emphasizes the beginning or start of an action or period.

dates back to

This phrase is specific to time references and indicates the period from which something originates.

stemmed from

This option emphasizes the cause or root from which something developed.

was assessed in relation to

This suggests an evaluation made considering a particular reference point.

FAQs

How is "was counted from" used in research papers?

In research, "was counted from" is used to specify the origin or source from which a numerical value or count was obtained. For example, "The number of participants meeting the criteria was counted from the survey responses" indicates that the survey responses were the data source.

What are some alternatives to "was counted from"?

Alternatives include "was calculated based on", "was determined by", or "was measured starting with", depending on the specific context. These options may be more suitable if you want to emphasize calculation, determination, or measurement processes.

When is it appropriate to use "was counted from" instead of "originated from"?

"Was counted from" is appropriate when a specific numerical count is derived from a source. "Originated from", on the other hand, is more suitable when indicating the general origin or source of something, rather than a precise count.

Can "was counted from" be used in non-scientific contexts?

While "was counted from" is frequently used in scientific contexts, it can also be used in other contexts where precise numerical data is derived from a specific source. For instance, "The funds raised were counted from the donation records" is a valid usage in a non-scientific setting.