was corrupted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was corrupted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that has been damaged, altered, or made impure, often in a digital or moral context. Example: "The file was corrupted during the transfer, making it impossible to open."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

(Naturally, the act could still be an act of corruption if some person was corrupted by it).

SEP

Successive governments institutionalised corruption, making it the lifeblood of Nigerian statecraft – the whole Nigerian society was corrupted in the process.

The Guardian - Opinion

"Sunset was corrupted, gang-banging".

The New York Times

I was corrupted at an early age.

The New York Times - Science

One is a policeman who was corrupted by them.

The New York Times

That was corrupted to 'skel' — anyone who's drunk or homeless".

The New Yorker

It was corrupted by the studio system and became capitalised.

Independent

The name Crommesshe was corrupted by the English into Gramercy.

The New York Times

The process was corrupted and the people betrayed.

The New York Times

He was corrupted not by money but by a desire for power.

The New Yorker

But she was a kind of innocent who was corrupted by power".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was corrupted", ensure the context clearly indicates what entity or concept underwent corruption and the nature of the corruption itself. Be specific about the source or cause of the corruption to provide clarity and impact.

Common error

Avoid using "was corrupted" in contexts where 'damaged' or 'altered' would be more appropriate. Corruption often implies a moral or functional degradation, not just a physical change.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was corrupted" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that a subject underwent a process of becoming damaged, tainted, or morally degraded. Ludwig AI confirms this usage with numerous examples across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

25%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

8%

Academia

7%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was corrupted" is a versatile passive construction indicating a state of damage, degradation, or moral decline. As verified by Ludwig AI, it's grammatically correct and frequently used across diverse contexts like News & Media, Science, and Wiki. Its neutral register makes it suitable for both formal and informal writing. When using "was corrupted", clarity is key: specifying the entity corrupted and the nature of the corruption enhances the impact. Common alternatives include "was tainted" and "was compromised".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was morally compromised

Emphasizes the moral aspect of the corruption.

became tainted

Implies a loss of purity or integrity through external influence.

was compromised

Suggests a weakening or undermining of something's integrity or security.

became debased

Suggests a decline in moral or ethical standards.

deteriorated

Focuses on the process of becoming worse.

was perverted

Indicates a distortion or deviation from what is considered right or natural.

degenerated

Implies a decline into a lower or worse state.

was defiled

Emphasizes the violation or desecration of something sacred or pure.

was vitiated

Highlights the impairment or weakening of something's quality or effectiveness.

was spoiled

Indicates that something has gone bad or is no longer usable.

FAQs

How can I use "was corrupted" in a sentence?

The phrase "was corrupted" describes a state of being morally, functionally, or structurally damaged. For example, "The evidence "was corrupted" by the investigator's tampering", or "The original data "was corrupted" during the transfer".

What are some alternatives to "was corrupted"?

Depending on the context, alternatives to "was corrupted" include "was tainted", "was compromised", "was spoiled", or "deteriorated".

Is it correct to say "was corrupted by"?

Yes, "was corrupted by" is a grammatically correct construction that indicates the cause or agent of the corruption. For instance, "The system "was corrupted" by malware".

What's the difference between "was corrupted" and "became corrupted"?

"Was corrupted" describes a state of having been corrupted, while "became corrupted" emphasizes the process of changing into a corrupted state. The choice depends on whether you want to highlight the current condition or the transition into that condition.