was corresponded to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was corresponded to" is correct and usable in written English.
It is commonly used when referring to an action that was done in response to something else. For example, "His request for an extension was corresponded to with a favorable response."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

16 human-written examples

The peak at 1383 cm−1 was corresponded to C H bending.

Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry

which was corresponded to the increase of antioxidative enzyme activities, but not to H2O2 accumulation.

Botanical Studies

The sensitivity limit of PCR-ELISA was 0·01 pg that was corresponded to 1 parasite/ml of blood.

Molecular and Cellular Probes

It can be seen that there were some dots on the amino group modified FS nanoparticles surface, which was corresponded to QDs.

Nanoscale Research Letters

Besides the peaks of iron oxide, there was a broad featureless XRD peak at low diffraction angle, which was corresponded to amorphous SiO2 shell.

Nanoscale Research Letters

The second peak at 54.9°C was corresponded to the sarcoplasmic protein and connective tissue, and the last peak at 67.7°C was related to actin denaturation.

International Aquatic Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

44 human-written examples

Its peak is corresponded to binding energy of 530.10 eV.

Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry

These equilibrium states are corresponded to low, medium and high monomer conversion rates.

ISA Transactions

The results were corresponded to those of the PCR and mouse inoculation.

Molecular and Cellular Probes

It is important to note that these predicted values were corresponded to the best FIS structure.

Applied Water Science

The design criteria to selecting beam and column dimensions are corresponded to linear equivalent static analysis.

International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Whenever possible, avoid using the passive construction "was corresponded to". Instead, opt for active voice constructions like "corresponded to" or "matched" for clearer and more direct writing.

Common error

Avoid overusing passive voice constructions like "was corresponded to", especially in scientific writing where clarity and precision are paramount. Active voice usually results in more concise and understandable sentences.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was corresponded to" functions as a passive construction indicating a relationship or match between two entities. While commonly used, Ludwig AI indicates it is often grammatically incorrect, suggesting a preference for the active voice or a more precise term.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "was corresponded to" appears frequently in scientific literature, it is often considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI highlights that it's better to opt for the active voice construction like "corresponded to" or use alternative phrases such as "matched" or "aligned with" for better clarity and conciseness. Given the grammatical issues and the availability of better alternatives, careful consideration should be given before using the phrase in formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

corresponded to

Omits "was", which is grammatically correct.

corresponded with

Uses "with" instead of "to", indicating a reciprocal relationship.

is related to

Replaces "corresponded to" with a more general term for association.

is associated with

Similar to "is related to", but implies a stronger connection.

matched

Suggests an exact equivalence or correspondence.

aligned with

Implies a directional agreement or similar orientation.

was equivalent to

Indicates that two things have the same value or significance.

is in agreement with

Implies a concordance or compatibility between two items.

is in line with

Signifies compliance or consistency with a standard or expectation.

was connected to

Suggests a link or relationship between items.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "corresponded to" in a sentence?

Use "corresponded to" without the auxiliary verb "was" when describing something that matches or is in direct relationship with something else. For example, "The observed increase in temperature corresponded to a rise in sea levels."

Is it always wrong to use "was corresponded to"?

While often used, "was corresponded to" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use just "corresponded to", "corresponded with", or a similar active construction.

What's the difference between "corresponded to" and "was related to"?

"Corresponded to" implies a direct, matching relationship. "Was related to" is broader and simply suggests a connection or association that is not necessarily a precise match.

What are some alternatives to "was corresponded to" that I can use in scientific writing?

Consider using alternatives like "matched", "aligned with", or "was equivalent to". These provide clarity and precision in scientific contexts.